Search for: "State v. Long"
Results 5861 - 5880
of 45,685
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2013, 10:04 am
See Gauthier v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 10:04 am
See Gauthier v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:49 am
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2009, 6:45 am
"--Court: Court of Appeals of KansasOpinion Date: 4/17/09Cite: Progressive Products, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 1:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:30 am
Armour v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 10:34 am
From Judge Ryan Nelson's opinion this morning in Jones v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 7:04 am
Part of this is result of the large variety of employment opportunities throughout the state, and part of it is a long history of California’s employers taking advantage of the working poor. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 10:04 pm
RB (Algeria)-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10; [2009] 2 WLR 512 says not. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:13 am
”) United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2025, 12:32 pm
This document represented that the subsidiary, EBA, had $29.9 million in long-term debt. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 6:12 am
Lydia Krebs won in State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 9:42 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 4:33 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 10:23 am
Justice Scalia’s dissent in Sykes v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 4:10 pm
Randi Roth, Court-appointed Monitor in the landmark race discrimination case against the United States Department of Agriculture, Pigford v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
Lady Justice Sharp proceeded to state, at [19] that, when the Court of Appeal comes to consider meaning: “The issue is not whether we would have come to the same or a different conclusion had we been trying the case at first instance. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:17 am
Inc. v. [read post]
