Search for: "Superior Court of California"
Results 5861 - 5880
of 10,170
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2012, 2:25 pm
In the most comprehensive report of prosecutorial misconduct to date, in 707 cases where courts found prosecutorial misconduct during a 13-year period in California (averaging about one instance a week), only six prosecutors were disciplined. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm
The clinic is fighting a display of alleged bank fraud and lender abuse that was written about in the California Superior Court documents,” he said. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 10:00 pm
Superior Court encouraged trial courts to formulate. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:31 pm
Superior Court (2008) 165 Cal.App.4th 25, review granted October 22, 2008 (S166350). [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 12:53 pm
On November 9, 2010, Commissioner Poizner filed an action in the Los Angeles Superior Court contesting the OAL’s determination and sought to clarify his authority to address insurer investments in companies doing business with Iran. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 10:12 am
After winning in the Superior Court and losing in the District Court of Appeal, the wife successfully convinced the California State Supreme Court that the trial judge made the right decision in allowing her to move with the children. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:07 pm
I recently read an amusingly cynical decision written by Judge Dennis Blackmon of the Superior Court of Carroll County, Georgia. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 10:06 am
CA Supreme Court Overturns Death Sentence for Man Who Burned Woman Over $100: Maura Dolan of the Los Angeles Times reports the California Supreme Court Thursday voted unanimously to overturn the death sentence for Gary Galen Brents, ruling that Orange County Superior Court Judge John J. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:32 am
In 2010, the California Attorney General’s office filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court for the State of California in Los Angeles against eight car washes across the state alleging that the businesses frequently denied employees minimum wage and overtime, denied employees adequate meal and rest breaks, and failed to pay wages owed to workers who quit or were terminated. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 9:31 am
On January 24, 2012, Judge Ernest Hiroshige of the Los Angeles Superior Court issued a tentative approval of a $5 million settlement agreement between Staples Inc. and a class of employees who allege that the office supply chain failed to pay them for floating holidays and vacations. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:02 am
The California invasion of privacy lawsuit was originally dismissed by an Orange County Superior Court judge on the grounds that the CHP had not breached any legal duty owed to the family. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 10:47 pm
The court acknowledged that Peters opted-out of the Lockabey v Honda Class action suit in San Diego Superior Court enabling her to seek redress in small claims court. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
The Superior Court concluded that the Board of Rights' findings were not supported by the weight of the evidence, granted the petition, and ordered Joaquin reinstated. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:26 am
(e) The person given access shall deliver all wills found in the safe deposit box to the clerk of the superior court and mail or deliver a copy to the person named in the will as executor or beneficiary as provided in Section 8200. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 5:40 am
Honda plans to have the case heard in LA County Superior Court. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:01 am
When plaintiff Laura Tenorio filed her Yaz lawsuit in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles on September 1, 2011, she likely wasn’t expecting that her case would be joined by many other similar lawsuits. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:10 pm
For the first time in California, the court established that surviving family members have a right to sue for invasion of privacy in such cases. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:57 pm
Superior Court (2009) 46 Cal.4th 969, 986.) [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 11:59 am
Superior Court (2004) 119 CA4th 1181 (pdf). [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:14 am
Finally, at least one Superior Court has ruled in an unpublished decision that a public employer, Metrolink, was not required to meet and confer with an employee bargaining unit before installing two inward-facing cameras in all of its locomotive cabs for purposes of monitoring the activities of its engineers. [read post]
