Search for: "United States v. Herring" Results 5861 - 5880 of 23,696
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2019, 6:20 am by Jeff Welty
Or does the existence of inexpensive drones present a novel Fourth Amendment concern that will require a novel doctrine to address it, as the Supreme Court arguably charted new courses regarding GPS tracking in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
On 8 March 2019, interim judgment was handed down in the apparently unremarkable case of Justyna Zeromska-Smith v United Lincolnshire Hospital Trust [2019] EWHC 552(QB). [read post]
10 May 2019, 12:35 pm by NBlack
The United States Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether law enforcement may obtain historical cell phone records last year. [read post]
10 May 2019, 12:35 pm by NBlack
The United States Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether law enforcement may obtain historical cell phone records last year. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
Respondent, a dual citizen of the United States and Norway, was born in Brooklyn, New York, but moved to Norway with her mother in 1993 at the age of eight. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Palencia v Perez, 2019 WL 1907867 (11th Cir., 2019) the district court concluded that Marilys Velasquez Perez had wrongfully retained her son, H.J.D.V., in the United States and away from Guatemala, his place of habitual residence. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:30 am by Frank Pasquale
Indeed, we are only beginning to get a glimpse of how truly terrible it may turn out to be....The United States is, I believe, in the most precarious position since 1860.... [read post]
10 May 2019, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Internal Investigations: The Consequences of Government “Outsourcing” The SDNY attracted quite a bit of attention last week with Judge McMahon’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]