Search for: "W. D." Results 5861 - 5880 of 13,766
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2015, 3:31 am
I’d like to see me win," said Roseanne Barr, who ran for the Green Party presidential nomination in 2012. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
As this press release explains, in May of 2014 a federal grand jury sitting in the U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:32 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Davis [also prolific before the SCOTUS, and who argued in favor of segregated schools] and Paul D. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 4:03 pm by Steven Hansen
(d)No person shall sell, or offer for sale, for use by an operator or passenger of a bicycle, nonmotorized scooter, skateboard, or in-line or roller skates any safety helmet is not of a type meeting requirements established by this section. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 4:03 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Moreover, given Father's professed inability to support himself as a podiatrist, Mother presents as more consistent in her ability to support A.L. financially. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 1:16 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Idea of subscription projects: authors extend into the market and interact w/readers: 1694 contract to translate Virgil w/upfront milestone payments. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Courts don’t evaluate whether a defendant’s work is transforming the P’s identity, but rather how creative the d’s work is. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:23 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
But a new branch arose, dealing w/largely functional works and reverse engineering. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 12:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  There is a real danger given ambiguities that there’d be a chilling effect. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Finally, courts are construing purpose very narrowly to find D’s purpose different from P’s purpose. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Interference w/ normal exploitation? [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 4:01 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
El Tribunal de Apelaciones para el Sexto Circuito determinó que Ford Motor Company no violó el Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) al no otorgar acomodo a una empleada con síndrome del intestino irritable, permitiéndole que trabajara desde su hogar con su computadora durante cuatro días a la semana. [read post]