Search for: "Weeks v. United States" Results 5861 - 5880 of 19,103
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
§§ 1481 and 1484, which require true and accurate information on invoices and entry documents.Government lawyers allege in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 10:17 am by John Elwood
This week finally answered our questions about what was going on with Azar v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am by Josh Blackman
In contrast, the independent-counsel statute at issue in Morrison v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 5:49 am by Matthew Weybrecht
The Constitution of the United States establishes a unitary executive, vesting all the executive power in the president. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 11:12 am by Sandy Levinson
 I’m hesitant to play the “neutral principles” card, but I would ask you to imagine your reaction if a similar amendment proposing, say, that the United States recognized Christianity as its official religion, had been sent to the states in 1789 and were “ratified” in a similarly stealth process as the 27thAmendment in 1992 or, indeed, 2018. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Collins v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
United States, where the court is being asked to rule on the permissibility of the police using phone records without a warrant. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 12:00 pm by Matthew D. Kaplan
Like other cases of prison abuse that I have written about in recent months it is a civil action built around 42 United States Code 1983. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 12:00 pm by Matthew D. Kaplan
Like other cases of prison abuse that I have written about in recent months it is a civil action built around 42 United States Code 1983. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 10:35 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Grayson Clary discussed the split circuit court opinions on the government’s authority to search electronic devices at the border, focusing on the Eleventh Circuit’s May 23 ruling in United States v. [read post]