Search for: "*/**u.s. v. May"
Results 5881 - 5900
of 54,394
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2015, 2:46 pm
Adkins, applied a 2013 ruling by the U.S. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 10:43 am
In Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 5:39 am
Evans, 514 U.S. 1, 11 (1994); United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:48 pm
Supreme Court decided today the high-stakes software patent case Bilski v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 4:16 pm
Accurately citing Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:15 am
TCL appealed the decision to the U.S. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 9:13 am
Bennett.Memorandum and Opinion granting summary judgment in part.Held: 1) A federal employee can seek relief for employment discrimination only by asserting causes of action under Title VII. 2) Not being nominated for a discretionary merit-based award may constitute an adverse employment action actionable under Title VII if the plaintiff can show that such a determination represents a decision on permanent pay status.Facts: Plaintiff, white male, worked for U.S. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:14 am
No: Justices O’ Donnell and Kennedy Key Statutes and Precedent U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 11:33 am
" It looks like some spoliation-of-evidence sanctions are rather likely, and the question may just be how impactful they will be.Follow @FOSSpatents Share with other professionals via LinkedIn: Share| [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 9:08 pm
Brooks v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:51 am
Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366, 375 (1993). [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 2:44 pm
Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 4:29 am
Ed. 2d 889 (1968) (recognizing that "a search which is reasonable at its inception may violate the Fourth Amendment by virtue of its intolerable intensity and scope"); United States v. $25,000 U.S. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 8:33 am
District Court for the Southern District of Georgia, in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
Goodyear Rubber Co., 128 U.S. 598 (1888). [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:54 am
Ohio Mar. 16, 2007)While the cost of retrieving archived email may have been substantial, the court declined to order plaintiff to pay a third party's cost of retrieving the email. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:34 pm
Org. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 3:27 pm
Kirby, 543 U.S. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 4:11 pm
Filed: November 16, 2009Opinion by Judge Clayton Greene, Jr.Held: An Australian distributor of asbestos, who used the port of Baltimore as a conduit in shipping raw asbestos from Australia to U.S. customers located outside of Maryland, did not attain sufficient minimum contacts with the State of Maryland to be subject to the Court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction.Facts: The personal representatives of two dockworkers who died from mesothelioma sued CSR based on the theory that… [read post]
