Search for: "ALL PLAINTIFFS "
Results 5881 - 5900
of 95,168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2013, 6:43 am
The defendant claims that the court improperly (1) rendered judgment against it on a theory of unjust enrichment despite evidence that it had paid all sums due and owing under its construction contract with Primrose, which necessarily included payment for the work done by the plaintiff as a subcontractor of Primrose, and (2) awarded prejudgment interest pursuant to General Statutes § 37-3a where there was no basis in law or in fact to award such interest. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:40 am
If the plaintiff brought the original complaint within the statute of limitations, and a defendant in the original complaint alleges that another tortfeasor carries some or all the fault, the plaintiff is allowed to amend the original complaint to add the tortfeasor within 90 days. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 9:17 am
” Instead, Plaintiff admits that consumers who purchase the third-party products may not even “know the name of [Planet Green]” at all. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 8:50 pm
ugh...I might have to miss class tomorrow, for jury duty :( well I managed to get off jury duty. all I had to do was wear a man-baby outfit. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 12:05 am
Moreover, the court notes that [plaintiff's] patents were all filed after June 1995, and, therefore, was not extending its patents' term by delaying to file the claims of the [patent-in-suit]. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 9:15 am
The plaintiffs in this case are all people in Missouri prisons for homicide offenses committed when they were less than 18 years old. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 3:40 pm
Plaintiff is not. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 7:21 am
The judge gave plaintiffs 14 days to file a motion for leave to amend their complaint if they had a factual basis for alleging a breach of the duty to defend and certified a question to the South Dakota Supreme Court to decide whether “the costs the Sapienzas incurred to comply with the injunction constitute covered ‘damages’ under the Policies. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:47 am
P. 23 that the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable, there are questions of law and fact common to the class, and the claims of the representative party is typical of the claims of the class. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
The usual scenario is this: Plaintiff, or plaintiffs, file a class action. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 10:42 pm
Interestingly, the Defendant denied that the crash happened at all. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 8:02 am
She was able to do all the activities that her mother wanted her to do such as walking around, sight seeing, and climbing stairs in the Metro. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:09 pm
After all, as the district court opinion stated: Plaintiffs’ sole cause of action alleges that USA Network breached an implied contract. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 12:00 pm
The Plaintiffs selected Parish of Plaquemines v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 12:00 pm
The Plaintiffs selected Parish of Plaquemines v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:15 pm
The defense lawyer leaves all this out. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 6:12 am
For a non-spoliating party, you can surely ask for the ultimate sanction but know that the court will make all efforts to fashion a remedy that punishes the spoliating party and still allows the case to be decided on the merits. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 7:50 pm
The Stern office sent a letter to Florida judges stating that they are stopping all foreclosure related operations in the State of Florida as of March 31, 2011. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 1:14 pm
For now at least, it seems that many cybersecurity-related D&O suits that are filed do not turn out to be all that great for the plaintiffs’ lawyers. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 4:15 pm
In the course of discovery, the defendant issued a document request to the plaintiff asking for all documents showing all payments that the plaintiff had made for work performed either “by MEP or at the direction of MEP. [read post]
