Search for: "C & S Company, Inc." Results 5881 - 5900 of 7,900
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2011, 7:16 am by Broc Romanek
Second, the Company's public filings disclosed that Oppenheimer & Co., Orchid's financial advisor, had advised the board that "no third party would likely propose a bid for the [C]ompany that would yield a result for the stockholders that would be higher than LabCorp's ... $2.80 per share indication of interest. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Joseph's Cemetery, 54 AD3d 835, 837, quoting Karaduman v Newsday, Inc., 51 NY2d 531, 546). [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
The examiner then reads these results, analyzes them and proceeds to gauge the credibility of the subject's answers. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm by Blog Editorial
Section 83(3)(a) made provision for ascertaining whether or to what extent a company has incurred a loss in respect of that business where an amount is added to an insurance companys long term business fund as part of or in connection with a transfer of business to that company and that amount shall be taken into account as an increase in value of the assets of the fund within section 83(2)(b). [read post]
16 May 2011, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  The New York Department of State's public record shows that the subject company called Stylish Move Sportswear, Inc. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:29 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Order, Tantus Tobacco LLC (“Tantus”), S&M Brands, Inc., Dosal Tobacco Corp., Farmer’s Tobacco Company, and Xcaliber International Ltd., LLC (collectively, “Nonparties”) moved to quash subpoenas duces tecum and ad testificandum served by Complainant Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:43 am by Lara
  Apparently, EMI is unwilling to allow Magic Wand to federally register its ENTREPRENEUR HALL OF FAME mark, even though another company formally owned by Mitch — Let’s Talk Business Network, Inc. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:24 pm by Aaron Barkoff
LLC, Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Synthon Holding B.V., that it believes the companies violated federal law by failing to inform antitrust authorities about drug patent agreements involving Sanofi's insomnia drug Ambien CR. [read post]