Search for: "D&S, Inc." Results 5881 - 5900 of 26,059
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2022, 5:27 am by Eugene Volokh
[Plaintiff's lawyer dodged a bullet in this case (and, fortunately, so did the defendant), but I bet they'd have preferred to have the judge not even speculate whether he "would risk his career on [this] matter. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 1:15 pm by WIMS
Access legislative details for S.387 (click here). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 10:51 am by Andrew Ramonas
The firm is representing eHealth Inc. on a "[d]elay in obtaining [a] business license from [the] Chinese Government" and "denial of market access in China," according to a lobbying registration report. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 12:15 am
Justin and Trautman, Lawrence J., Financial Institution D&O Liability After Caremark and McDonald's (September 9, 2023). [read post]
25 May 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Andryeyeva v New York Health Care, Inc., 33 NY3d 152, the Appellate Division said that in construing a statute, "words must be 'harmonize[d]' and read together to avoid surplusage. [read post]
25 May 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing Andryeyeva v New York Health Care, Inc., 33 NY3d 152, the Appellate Division said that in construing a statute, "words must be 'harmonize[d]' and read together to avoid surplusage. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 3:05 am
In re Brand Design Company, Inc. d/b/a DBA House Industries, Serial No. 87658330 (November 16, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jonathan Hudis). [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 3:09 am
In re Jeco, Inc., Serial No. 86972193 (October 18, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Anthony R. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 6:13 am
Mike Bersani Email me at: bersani@michaels-smolak.com I'd love to hear from you! [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 9:36 am
Meantime, his first book is coming out later this fall - Dog, Inc., about the cloning of man's best friend. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Brown, (D OR, filed 10/16/2020) asserts various 1st and 14th Amendment claims, including the charge that the Orders unlawfully target religious schools. [read post]