Search for: "Does 1 - 23" Results 5881 - 5900 of 15,479
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2014, 5:44 am
The use of this new reference has not heretofore been made, nor does it form part of the formal rejections that are the subject of this appeal. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:39 am by Chijioke Okorie
In Constance Mongale and 3 others v Speaker of the National Assembly and 15 others, which was heard on 23 February 2023, the applicants’ complaints were inter alia that “Parliament and the Provincial Legislatures have failed to comply with their constitutional obligation to facilitate public involvement, as required by sections 72(1)(a) and 118(1)(a) of the Constitution, before passing the Traditional and Khoi-San Leadership Act 3 of 2019 (“the… [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 5:14 am by Florian Mueller
What would have been achievable if those advocating weaker patent enforcement rules had done a better job would have been for the court to acknowledge that high invalidation rates--even though the law isn't a matter of statistics--may go into the proportionality analysis.The abject failure of efforts to reform German patent remedies law is demonstrated by today's decision, which cites § 139(1) of the German Patent Act (PatG), but does not even go on to quote or… [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 2:07 pm by Liisa Speaker
 How does the honest-belief rule apply to the cat’s paw theory of liability? [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 10:56 am by Arthur F. Coon
  The new legislation applies to all cities, including charter cities, and sunsets on January 1, 2025. [read post]
21 May 2019, 7:31 pm by Francis Pileggi
A recent Delaware Supreme Court decision is noteworthy for: (1) addressing damages for breach of consent-rights, as well as (2) discussing the concept of efficient breach. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 11:22 am by Orin Kerr
 In the three cases that did reach the merits, however, the government’s side readily won: 8-0, 8-1, and 7-2. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:04 pm by Tonya Gisselberg
  The plaintiff in a trademark case does not have to prove damages to the penny. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In G 4/92 [10], the EBA stated: “As regards new arguments, the requirements of A 113(1) have been satisfied even if a party who has chosen not to appear consequently did not have the opportunity to comment on them during OPs, insofar as such new arguments do not change the grounds on which the decision is based. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The EBA had held that Article 53(b) EPC does not exclude plants from patentability, even if they are obtained through an essentially biological process. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 8:04 am by Alex Phipps
Considering (1), the court explained it was error under State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Hannah Steeves
Based on available data from the fall of 2021, the majority of students entering a Canadian law school in 2022 are between 23–25.[5] This means they were born between 1997 and 2000. [read post]