Search for: "H. D." Results 5881 - 5900 of 15,642
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2016, 4:52 am
This Kat reported on the publication of the draft Statutory Instrument that will implement the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court in UK law, with a promise of a detailed report later. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 9:39 am by Rory Little
US, No.14-10154, directed at Assistant to Solicitor General Ilana H. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:30 am by Joy Waltemath
“When used correctly, high-skilled foreign worker programs can help grow our economy and spur job creation in ways that benefit all Americans,” Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee said in prepared remarks. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 5:17 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Conservative Solutions PAC spokesman Jeff Sadosky responded: It’s no surprise that Donald is desperately afraid of voters learning about how he’s fleeced families out of millions through his scam college, but he can’t scare us off from sharing his record and his business’s D- rating from the Better Business Bureau. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:08 pm
" Contents include: Dossier : La justice pénale internationale en tant que projet critiqueJulien Pieret & Marie-Laurence Hébert-Dolbec La justice pénale internationale en tant que projet critique : IntroductionDiane Bernard, Faut-il croire en le droit (international pénal) ? [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 12:51 pm
Giovanni Distefano, Gloria Gaggioli, & Aymeric Hêche have published La convention de Vienne de 1978 sur la succession d'États en matière de traités : Commentaire article par article et études thématiques (Bruylant 2016). [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 5:25 am
April 2016.Die Veranstalter wählen höchstens 14 Kandidaten aus, wobei auf ein Gleichgewicht der Themen und der Perspektiven geachtet wird. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Can., 2014-03-20), 2014 CSC 20, SOQUIJ AZ-51056184, 2014EXP-972, J.E. 2014-524, [2014] 1 R.C.S. 392, affaire dans laquelle la Cour suprême avait conclu que l’application rétroactive de l’abolition de la PEE était une peine au sens de l’article 11 h) de la Charte canadienne des droits et libertés. [read post]