Search for: "HOPE v. STATE"
Results 5881 - 5900
of 16,490
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2017, 1:55 pm
And, perhaps because of that, I'm hopeful that some state representative (or the Judicial Council) will use this opinion to change the law.But I also recognize that the Legislature is imperfect. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 10:50 am
Palm Beach, 561 F.3d 1288, 1291–92 (11th Cir. 2009); see also Hope v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself: see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9] A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:27 am
Messenger v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 2:40 pm
It is well known that in NFIB v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 11:55 am
” See Reed v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 9:35 am
In Ambac Assurance Corp. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 12:46 pm
Prior to implementation of the final DFARS rule, the Government received comments seeking clarification on the definition of CDI, with several contractors hoping this information could be limited to that specifically designated by the Government under a contract. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:23 am
The first is Packingham v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 3:05 pm
Osman, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Harrow (2017) EWHC 274 (Admin) A challenge to Harrow’s allocation policy, specifically on the ‘downgrading’ of allocation priority for overcrowded households in PRS accommodation, while existing Harrow tenants kept the higher priority for overcrowding on a transfer application. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 7:00 am
They were buoyed by Justice William Rehnquist’s 1985 dissent in Wallace v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:19 pm
The Constitution says that Congress (and the States) may not abridge the right to free speech. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 8:10 am
The employer community is hopeful the D.C. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 8:10 am
The employer community is hopeful the D.C. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 7:19 am
Sebelius and Arizona v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:29 am
” Yasay also expressed hope that “a more concrete and clearer picture" of the United States' approach to the region under President Donald Trump would develop in the coming months. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 1:40 pm
” State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 1:40 pm
” State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 1:44 pm
At first glance, Coventry Health Care v. [read post]
