Search for: "IN RE T A G" Results 5881 - 5900 of 7,052
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2015, 7:59 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2015)I have been invited to participate in a Workshop on a Treaty on Business and Human Rights, hosted by the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, organized by the Autónoma and the Fakulteta za državne in evropske študije and convened by Jernej Letnar Černič and Nicolás Carrillo-Santarelli. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:59 am by SOQUIJ
Procureur général du Québec, 2022 QCCS 4625Juridiction : Cour supérieure (C.S.), MontréalDécision de : Juge Thomas M. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm by Benjamin Wittes
” So I know what you’re thinking: If the opinion is devastating and if it correctly concludes that the president probably committed crimes, doesn’t that require a criminal investigation on the part of the Justice Department? [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:28 am
  Here we’re singing from the same hymnals, such as Dr. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:22 am by Steve Hall
He was joined by the court’s liberal justices, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
J 10/01 [15-20], J 24/03 [4], J 18/04 [2.1], J 7/05 [3] and G 1/09 [3.2.4]. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:24 pm by David Lat & Elie Mystal
YOU ARE SO G****MN RICH AND YOU ARE GIVING ME THIS PIECE OF S**T C**KFACE F**K-YOU IN THE A**HOLE BONUS? [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:51 pm by Matt Cameron
We’re not sure what it all means yet. (2) Well, kind of. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 4:23 am by Kevin LaCroix
  The Chief Justice asked this question, and the Fund’s counsel correctly responded that “[g]enerally, you have summary judgment after class certification. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 1:39 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
” Please note: if you ever use the term “sign-in-wrap” in a non-mocking way, another puppy will have a bad day (In other words, DON’T DO IT). [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 9:12 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Photo credit: internet connect hyperlink // ShutterStock Earlier this week, we posted about a Seventh Circuit case where an ambiguous user call-to-action undermined an online contract formation procecss. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am by Marie Louise
(IPKat) (IPKat) 99 mentions of ‘design’ but it’s really a copyright case: Tribunale di Milano  reference to ECJ Flos SpA v Semeraro Casa e Famiglia SpA (Class 99) (1709 Blog) (IPKat) Combination of yellow and grey colours not distinctive: T-299/09 and T-300/09 Gühring v OHIM (Class 46) The grace-period trap – or ‘don’t say it’s a copy and you’ll be all right’ (Class 99) France Protection of trade… [read post]