Search for: "In re: Justice v."
Results 5881 - 5900
of 18,110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm
Of Virginia v. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 4:02 am
I flagged Lawfare’s latest job opening: We’re hiring an associate editor, and you or someone you know might be exactly who we’re looking for. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 10:33 pm
One, in Gonzales v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 7:16 am
Violation of either of these conditions would, of course, subject Weida to the prospect of re-incarceration. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 5:52 am
Hans, a professor of law at Cornell Law School published an article on April 20, 2018 titled Trial by Jury: An American Expert Tells Us What We’re Losing. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:03 pm
For example, Mr Justice Warby’s judgment in the recent Right to be Forgotten cases, NT 1 and NT 2 v Google [2018] EWHC 799 (QB) was accompanied by a four-page summary to help lay readers understand the judgment. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:14 am
Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:14 am
Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am
In proceedings before the EPO, re-establishment of rights under Article 122 EPC is ruled out in respect of the period under Rule 49ter.2(b)(i) PCT for filing a request for restoration of a right of priority. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am
In proceedings before the EPO, re-establishment of rights under Article 122 EPC is ruled out in respect of the period under Rule 49ter.2(b)(i) PCT for filing a request for restoration of a right of priority. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:46 pm
“In Post 37, Mike Madison asks the question, “How do we bring non-academics [legal tech, legal practitioners, access to justice advocates] meaningfully into the dialogue? [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 12:26 pm
The case, Trump v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 9:04 am
This is the question that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has been asked to address in Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Renckhoff, C-161/17.This morning Advocate General (AG) Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered his Opinion[not yet available in English], and answered in the negative.Let’s see what happened.BackgroundWell, the background is quite ... ridiculous (in the sense that it is ridiculous that litigation is brought in the first place in instances like… [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:37 am
He told Phillips that he wasn’t convinced that the court’s 1942 decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm
Writing for seven of the justices (all but Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Neil Gorsuch), Justice Clarence Thomas took a straight and simple route to upholding the statute. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 11:33 am
Pereira v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:56 am
Wuerth notes that in the 2015 case of Sachs v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 10:00 pm
V. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 2:33 pm
When the justices started their last week of arguments this morning with Lucia v. [read post]
