Search for: "In re Faith S." Results 5881 - 5900 of 11,706
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2014, 10:48 am by Jack Sharman
“It could be derived from anything but often it’s the brand of spirit you’re using,” he says. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:20 am by Amy Howe
” At Res Judicata, Richard Re examines the “doctrine formerly known as ‘statutory standing’” in the context of last Term’s decision in Lexmark International v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:39 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
At issue was the State’s refusal to give full faith and credit to a tribal court order in a tribal adoption case heard by the Kaltag Tribal Court. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:14 am by Joy Waltemath
The employer also argued with regard to the second employee that the discharge claim was not actionable because she had been re-offered her job shortly after she was fired. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 5:55 pm by INFORRM
Nobody wants to be told what to do – and often they’re quite right to resist what they’re told to do. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 4:11 am by David DePaolo
"So here's my answer - I think this is bullshit.These are the kind of actions that take faith out of the system, creates mistrust, harms people, destroys lives.Because some assholes have can't regulate their own greed.And what is the penalty to the TPA that allows this misconduct and lapse in ethics and morals? [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 10:11 am by Arthur F. Coon
  In any event, the Times reported Brown indicated that “his hopes [to take up CEQA reform if re-elected] have dimmed significantly” and that “[while] [h]e wouldn’t say CEQA reform is dead, …he compared hurdles in changing the law to revising the Catholic Church’s persistent opposition to birth control. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
The plaintiff also accused the Shirian Group members of instituting in bad faith a separate lawsuit against plaintiff claiming breach of fiduciary duty, and wrongfully refusing to negotiate a buy-out. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
  In addition to the above conditional language, contingencies should also provide:  1) a specific date or time period (for the occurrence/non-occurrence of the event); 2) a statement that the contingency is automatically waived or requires notice, after expiration of the time period; 3) a statement that performance is excused (and the agreement void and of no effect) if the condition occurs/does not occur; 4) statement re:  return of earnest monies (if so negotiated); and 5)… [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 6:50 pm
The Archbishop of Oklahoma City has sued the Satanists to get back the consecrated host that they’re planning to use in their Black Mass on Sept. 21 (that’s the Black Mass I blogged about in this post). [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
In re Nichols, (D MD, Aug. 15, 2014), is an action by the trustee for the bankruptcy estate of Lynette Tawana Nichols seeking to recover from God's Universal Kingdom Christian Church over $93,000 in contributions the church received from Nichols in the three years preceding her filing for bankruptcy. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
In a recent ruling, In re Madelyn B., the Supreme Court of New Hampshire said yes, under a state statute that grants parental status to a person who has held out a child as her own. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 10:44 am by Bill
That's the New Minstrelsy, right there, the performer telling the audience, "Yeah, yeah-- we're going to stick to our set list, so STFU. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:00 am by Joe Markowitz
Non-enforcement might be better for business.Will Tesla's new stance cause other companies to re-think the value of enforcing their patent rights? [read post]