Search for: "Individual Does 1-10"
Results 5881 - 5900
of 14,846
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2011, 11:36 pm
Nor does it help with understanding the difference between freedom of thought contained in Article 18(1), which is expressly non-derogable per Article 4 and not subject to clawback by Article 19(3), and freedom of opinion contained in Article 19(1). ? [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:13 am
[10] See OddzOn Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:48 pm
LEXIS 651 (La. 4/01/10) Remand in light of Atkins claims. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:39 am
For married couples the exemption is $10 million. [read post]
How is regulatory policy influencing the development and marketing of antibody testing for COVID-19?
4 May 2020, 12:56 pm
For example, if 1% of people are known to have been infected (as determined by an RT-PCR test) and a test is 99% specific, then testing 100 people would likely yield one true positive and one false positive—meaning that an individual who tests positive would have a 50% chance of not actually having antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 2:37 pm
And the value of unused drugs discarded due to SDV rules is said to be approaching $1 billion annually. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:58 am
In other words, more than 8 out of 10 Americans support what A.B. 375 seeks to codify into law. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:28 am
However, the Directive does impose stringent requirements as to the nature of the sign of which a mark must consist and these are addressed under Articles 2 and 3 of the Directive. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 2:22 pm
It does not include a hemp product that is intended to be inhaled. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 12:35 pm
APPROACH This Strategy seeks to build and enhance collaboration around five pillars: 1. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:23 am
In the UK, it would have been determined under the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988, section 10(1) of which states:“a work of joint authorship means a work produced by the collaboration of two or more authors in which the contribution of each author is not distinct from that of the other author or authors”. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 8:27 am
Yesterday was session 10 for this year, so I suppose a milestone awaits. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
The EPO sent a notification pursuant to R 69(1) EPC 1973 dated March 16, 2006. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 10:59 am
All sorts of personal and private information may be found and allegedly used for illegal purposes in a medical identity theft case. 1. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 8:08 am
Rule 9j-1 also incorporates additional language that Rule 10b-5 does not, but that has been addressed in case law interpreting Rule 10b-5. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 12:55 pm
The company’s very terse description in its 10-Q does not even identify the specific country or countries in which the allegedly improper payments took place, saying only that the investigation is looking into payments relating to “contracts in certain Middle East countries. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 1:12 am
" I have a hard time understanding why an appellate attorney's failure to either (1) read or (2) understand that requirement does not constitute "wanton disobedience or extreme negligence"? [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 1:32 pm
As discussed here, in a February 10, 2012 Memorandum Opinion and Order, Chief Judge Sidney Fitzwater ruled that the SEC would be required to produce: (1) all nonprivileged portions of its investigative file for the SEC’s separate investigation into Mamma.com; and (2) all documents pertaining to the relationship between the Mamma.com investigation and the investigation into Mr. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 1:32 pm
As discussed here, in a February 10, 2012 Memorandum Opinion and Order, Chief Judge Sidney Fitzwater ruled that the SEC would be required to produce: (1) all nonprivileged portions of its investigative file for the SEC’s separate investigation into Mamma.com; and (2) all documents pertaining to the relationship between the Mamma.com investigation and the investigation into Mr. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:10 am
(NYSCEF doc. no. 1 at ¶ 10, 14; NYSCEF doc. no. 21, plaintiff’s medication history.) [read post]
