Search for: "JAMES V. STATE" Results 5881 - 5900 of 10,682
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2013, 8:26 am by BakerHostetler
Authors: Gonzalo Zeballos, James Sherer, and Alan Pate Asian Data Privacy Updates  1. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:26 am by Admin
Posted by AdminAuthors: Gonzalo Zeballos, James Sherer, and Alan Pate Asian Data Privacy Updates  1. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:10 am by Eric Goldman
Normally, a proposal like this get rubber-stamped through a state bar’s review process, so its approval seemed inevitable. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by David S. Kemp
Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 12:29 pm by Graham Smith
Also look out for Football Dataco v Stan James in the UK Supreme Court, a database right case under appeal on the question of joint liability.5. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 10:36 am by Padraic F.X. Dugan, Esq.
On December 18, 2013 the New Jersey Appellate Division published an opinion in the matter of Harte v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:00 am by Karen Tani
Andrew Holowchak, Framing a Legend: Exposing the Distorted History of Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings (Prometheus Books, 2013).In her State of the Field essay, "The Complicated Histories of Emancipation," Manisha Sinha (University of Massachusetts, Amherst) reviews James Oakes, Freedom National: The Destruction of Slavery in the United States, 1861–1865 (W. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 3:00 am by Dan Ernst
The Progressive Origins of Conservative Hostility to Lochner v. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 6:16 am
--> After a jury convicted James Lykins of one count of manufacturing methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
  At the time this decision was rendered, the court was applying Askey v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:05 am
--> At some point prior to November, 2013, James Dillow was charged with “receipt, distribution, and possession of child pornography in violation o  18 U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 11:43 am by Daniel A. Burton, Esq.
  As mentioned above, enforcing the clear and unambiguous language set forth in the proposed legislation is an easier and more efficient prospect for the judiciary of this State because they are no longer required to make the determination as to whether the decision in B.C. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:57 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Earlier this week, Military Judge James Pohl, the presiding judge at the military commission case United States v. [read post]