Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 5881 - 5900
of 21,107
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2019, 10:05 am
This reflects: The difficulty of prosecuting large corporate defendants: Given the requirement for the directing mind and will to have committed the offences under sections 1 and 2 (and 6) of the Bribery Act in order for the corporate to be held liable, “it remains extremely difficult to prosecute large corporates for the substantive offences of bribery under sections 1 or 6 of the Act. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 9:52 am
S. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 9:31 am
If the owner is held strictly liable, he or she must pay both the human victim’s medical expenses and the veterinary costs if another animal was involved. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 9:22 am
” In so holding, the court of appeals agreed with the trial court that the defendant’s pre-trial offers of settlement, while not in agreement with the plaintiff’s pre-trial opinion of the value of the case, were sufficient to inoculate it against liability under Chapter 176D. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:16 am
Plaintiffs further contend that the work performed by defendants BTE and later Montag Architects was defective, and, as a result of BTE’s and Montag Architects’ negligence and malpractice, plaintiffs have incurred $2,000,000 damages. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 5:26 pm
The plaintiff filed a civil warrant on January 24, 2014, against the defendants, the other driver involved in the accident and his employer, in which the plaintiff alleged the defendants were negligent and therefore liable for his injuries. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:07 pm
As reinterpreted, the Labor Department began enforcing the joint employment rule to hold businesses liable based on even very limited indirect influence over wages or other employment conditions. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 11:52 am
B289766, some defendants may not be vicariously liable for the actions of chapters that are run independently. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:29 am
Defendant appealed. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 7:49 am
It's Free.Have a Plagiarism Problem? [read post]
30 Mar 2019, 11:29 am
In some cases, more than one defendant may be liable, including not only other drivers but car owners, manufacturers and road engineers, as well as alcohol vendors. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 2:24 pm
If the accident is outside of the defendant’s set of duties, or they don’t have a duty at all, the accused most likely isn’t liable for the injuries. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 12:30 pm
Can the City and the Sheriff by held liable by the victim's parents? [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
Could Employer Be Liable for Worker’s Choice to Drink? [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 8:00 am
From that trial court order, Harris appealed, arguing that after acquiring the nursing home, Symphony represented itself to the public as “Countryside Care Centre” with the knowledge and acquiescence of the Countryside defendants, thus creating an issue of fact as to whether the Countryside defendants could be held vicariously liable for Symphony’s negligence under a theory of apparent agency. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:06 am
In addition, Bell takes the position that each defendant is vicariously liable for any third-party downloads from their websites and any profits a third-party may have received from their use of the downloaded copies. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 6:37 am
Fabrizi) and the passenger in the Defendant’s vehicle with violence by getting out of the Third Party vehicle, yelling at them and hitting the window and other parts of the Defendant’s vehicle and other gestures causing the occupants of the Defendant’s vehicle to fear for their lives. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 6:09 am
Otherwise, you may have to identify other liable defendants against whom you can litigate your injury claims. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
The judge granted the Department’s motion as it concerned the Department’s liability for its negligent actions, but denied the motion regarding the Department’s vicarious liability for the actions of its agents. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed Supreme Court's granting the defendant's motion to dismiss Petitioner's complaint, explaining that Plaintiff's allegations relating to disability retirement recommendations of the Police Pension Fund's Medical Board are misdirected as [a] the Police Pension Fund is a corporate entity independent and distinct from the police department or the City of New York and [b] is not… [read post]
