Search for: "Light v. United States" Results 5881 - 5900 of 11,326
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 9:21 am by Scott Bomboy
” The United States has filed a brief in the case and asked to take part in arguments. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Generally speaking, estoppel cannot be used against a state or municipal government (see e.g., New York State Medical Transporters Association v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:31 am
A recent decision by the United States Court of... [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
The judges observed that the Hatch-Waxman Act appears to be very sensitive to antitrust concerns, and cited several cases (inter alia, United States v Singer Mfg. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am by Epstein Becker Green
 In its brief UPS states “While UPS’s denial of [Young’s] accommodation request was lawful at the time it was made (and thus cannot give rise to a claim for damages), pregnant UPS employees will prospectively be eligible for light-duty assignments. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
 In its brief UPS states “While UPS’s denial of [Young’s] accommodation request was lawful at the time it was made (and thus cannot give rise to a claim for damages), pregnant UPS employees will prospectively be eligible for light-duty assignments. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:28 pm
It came as ’something of a surprise’ that the case had reached the Lords in the light of R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2008] UKHL 14. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 3:31 am
Appellants argued that the ATJs were likewise principal officers of the United States, and were unconstitutionally appointed. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
From the moment the Supreme Court granted cert in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:41 pm by Theodore T. Eidukas
The employee in the case was a part-time driver for United Parcel Service of America, Inc. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 10:35 pm by Florian Mueller
Tex. and unsuccessfully appealed by Ericsson's adversary in that case, HTC, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:13 am by Beth Graham
In March 2004 the arbitration panel ruled in favor of Hancock, and the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, confirmed the award a few months later. [read post]