Search for: "Mark Case"
Results 5881 - 5900
of 70,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 pm
The tally of infections just topped the half million mark and the spread shows little sign of slowing. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 8:54 am
"Piercing the 5th Circuit's veil of secrecy": At the blog "LawBeat," Mark Obbie has a post that begins, "Lise Olsen's incendiary report in [Sunday's] Houston Chronicle on the case of U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 12:45 pm
The Associated Press is reporting: Mark Sherman reports that "Supreme Court Could Take Guns Case. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:43 am
It does seem that this decision to expedite these cases was made in haste without much thought about the practical aspects of the policy. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 11:40 am
Marks was indicted along with nine family members in 2011, as a result of what the DOJ cleverly named "Operation Crystal Ball." [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:12 am
Trademark Examining Attorney Hanno Rittner issued refusals in two applications to register the mark shown below, comprising a background design of adjacent white and blue rectangles outlined in blue, for various communications and computer-related consultation services, on the ground that the applied-for mark fails to function as a service mark. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:34 am
" The websites listed product categories in only limited fields.Turning to the marks, in both cases "invisible" has an obvious suggestive meaning. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 5:24 am
“Sonia Sotomayor’s Dissent in the Big Voter-Purge Case Points to How the Law Might Still Be Struck Down”: Law professor Richard L. [read post]
27 Nov 2008, 6:46 pm
The IPKat's old friend and highly respected trade mark attorney Sally Cooper is highly indignant with regard to current UK-IPO trade mark registration practice. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:00 am
Photos should depict the accident scene, damage to the vehicles involved, any visible injuries, and any other relevant details, such as traffic signs, skid marks, or road conditions. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:51 am
” Sec. 2(k) of S. 23 also would provide that only the United States may sue for the statutory penalty of $500 per offense authorized by Sec. 292(a) of the false marking law.The effective date provision of Sec. 2(k) of S. 23 would make the false marking amendments applicable “to all cases, without exception, pending on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 2:36 pm
Two years later, a second qui tam whistleblower, Mark Campbell, came forward. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:04 am
The Cleveland Plain Dealer reports, "Ken Burns leads PBS fall lineup," by TV writer Mark Dawidziak. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 3:32 am
Pamela Chestek, ip ownership maven, comments here on the ownership issue in the recent METAL GEAR case. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 5:34 am
Facts: This case (Kinney v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
My name is Mark C. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 3:32 am
Case date: 01 April 2019 Case number: No. 17-14211 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:51 am
In a January 2016 letter [here], the Director of the USPTO recommended that the case be remanded to the USPTO because the reasoning in the CAFC's Tam decision "requires the invalidation of Section 2(a)’s prohibition against registering scandalous and immoral marks as well. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 1:14 am
Analysis The scope of protection of the trade mark First of all, the court recalled that, according to case LTJ Diffusion C-291/00:Since the perception of identity between the sign and the trade mark is not the result of a direct comparison of all the characteristics of the elements compared, insignificant differences between the sign and the trade mark may go unnoticed by an average consumer. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 1:24 am
Following the decision in DHL Express France, if a court does not find a likelihood of confusion in a part of the EU (as in the case at hand) for any reason, such as a linguistic one, the mark isn't adversely affected and the scope of the injunction has to be restricted. [read post]
