Search for: "Reiter v. Reiter"
Results 5881 - 5900
of 6,283
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2008, 4:53 pm
Reiterating that "vested rights cannot be acquired in reliance upon an invalid permit" the Appellate Division of the First Department upheld a determination of the New York City Board of Standards and Appeals ("BSA") in the case In re GRA, LLC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 6:16 am
But never have I read a dissent like this, from Tucker v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 10:03 pm
MOSLEY, 423 U.S. 96 (1975) AND UNITED STATES v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 6:30 am
In Frankel v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 10:07 am
Compare McNellis v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 2:52 pm
Morales v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 1:50 pm
Case Name: Proffit v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Harrington v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 2:41 am
Slip op. at 16 (citing Public Access Shoreline Hawaii v. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 3:03 pm
Citing the Court's decision in Lujan v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Thrift Auto Repair, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 9:23 pm
He found the case to be distinguishable from Rust v. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 10:02 am
Like the proceedings seeking those measures, Ameziane's complaint was filed by the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR): since the Supreme Court's June 2008 ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:29 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 10:02 am
Per Makky v. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 2:53 pm
" Blue Bell, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 9:30 pm
In Rossi v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:28 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 4:02 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 3:15 pm
The Supreme Court of Ohio ruled yesterday in Evanich v Bridge (Slip Opinion No. 2008-Ohio-3820) that subjective intent of one party to acquire property of another is not required to prevail on an adverse possession claim; rather, the claimant must show by clear and convincing evidence that he possessed the disputed property and treated it as his own for a period of 21 years. [read post]
