Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 5881 - 5900
of 13,842
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2016, 3:07 am
A collection of amicus briefs in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 6:04 pm
But at least 45 plaintiffs joined in a suit filed in California federal court in a case entitled Zhang v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:45 pm
Even former United States Attorney General Eric Holder recently expressed his belief that marijuana “ought to be rescheduled. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:29 pm
[i] Practical rationality is both long- and short-term oriented as well as highly invasive and encompassing since it unites the different means under a long-term arc. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 7:49 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:49 am
California, supra. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am
The Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (2006) or “RULLCA” continues to gain momentum as it spreads across the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am
The Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (2006) or “RULLCA” continues to gain momentum as it spreads across the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 3:11 am
The Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (2006) or “RULLCA” continues to gain momentum as it spreads across the United States. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm
In other news New South Wales may become the first state to institute laws for invasions of privacy, after the State Parliament’s law and justice committee recommended that NSW should “lead the way” in Australia with laws of this type. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 2:45 pm
Lynch, "the California case challenging the Obama Administration’s practice of detaining immigrant families and unaccompanied minors. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 2:01 pm
Both “are Mexican corporations, are not registered in Texas or any of the United States, and do not have any offices, employees, agents, or representatives in Texas. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 10:19 am
United States, 466 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir. 1972). [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 8:58 am
Then Caliburger cooked up it’s next plan: restaurants in the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 8:02 am
If that’s CDCR’s argument, it’s plainly wrong: in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 5:23 am
(And in some states, like California, they cannot do so without running afoul of state minimum wage laws.) [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 1:02 pm
California [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 12:39 pm
” As a result, government mandates requiring people to speak are subject to strict scrutiny—the most stringent standard of judicial review in the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym of the Federal District Court for the District of Central California. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 12:09 pm
Bank of the United States v. [read post]