Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 5881 - 5900
of 19,223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2009, 11:18 am
A recent court decision in the matter of Williams v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:52 am
Since Daimler AG v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 5:06 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2005, 7:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 1:05 pm
Sometimes with other classic marks of rapid California appellate justice; here, footnote 14, which entails a lengthy discussion of a case discussed at oral argument that's relegated to a footnote because (of course) this was all added after the draft opinion had already been prepared.Unfortunately, the combination of statutory deadlines and the way state chambers sometimes works results on occasion in an opinion that's much less readable than it could be. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am
The appellant, Mark Sutherland, began corresponding on Grindr with a member of a PH group, Groom Resisters Scotland, posing as a thirteen year old boy (“the decoy”). [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 2:57 am
Welsh v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 8:58 am
[Ed. note: This case was handled by the Arizona FPD.]United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Linford: do we think of certain types of marks as innovative? [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
See Prestonettes, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 6:23 am
See Prestonettes, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:55 am
Yesterday the Court announced that it had granted review in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
The mark scheme stated that such a claim could not be considered inventive because one of the prior art documents (D2) disclosed fuses with glass layers that were inherently configured to soften and flow. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 3:30 am
North Atlantic Operating Company, Inc., North Atlantic Trading Company, Inc. and National Tobacco Company, LP v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:55 am
Coming up for consideration by the Court of Justice of the European Union is Case C-179/15 Daimler, a reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hungarian Fővárosi Törvényszék. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 3:47 pm
Laws in this area are not universal or uniform (even as between states that are parties to the ECHR). [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:02 am
The first was Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 2:43 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 2:43 pm
Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:10 am
AFSCME (argued February 26, 2018): This is a case filed by Mark Janus, an Illinois child-support specialist. [read post]
