Search for: "State v. Read"
Results 5881 - 5900
of 64,315
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2021, 7:58 am
–Van Buren v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 8:53 am
Read the oral argument preview of this case here. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:55 pm
R (on the application of Evans) v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice [2011] EWHC 1146 (Admin) - Read judgment The High Court has found that the Ministry of Justice, when making a decision to cease the state’s funding of judicial review challenges on purely public interest grounds (apart from one exception), took into account the fact that to do so would reduce the number of decisions being made which were not in the… [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 9:27 pm
In Danielle Seaman v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 11:50 am
In footnote 145 I state: "Judge Bell in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 5:02 am
Contreras v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:48 pm
In Olmstead v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:18 pm
United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am
Reading para 22 of Sch 2 together with para 16 his Lordship held that: … Applying the strict approach to interpretation which I consider is required here, these provisions must be taken to refer to detention which is lawful … The words employed are certainly not appropriate to refer to a state of purported detention or to embrace both lawful and unlawful detention. [read post]
22 May 2018, 6:53 am
This is contrary to their right to legal recognition of their relationship regardless of sexual orientation, pursuant to art 8, read together with ECHR, art 14. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 3:48 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:47 am
On May 2, 2019, in Vazquez v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 1:35 pm
Adar v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:36 pm
People v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:41 am
The decision in the Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 7:37 am
The articles of impeachment read very much like the letter sent by Missouri Rep. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 7:42 am
Read the oral argument preview here. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 3:35 am
” Levy v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 11:52 am
Herlihy v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 11:05 pm
I recently persuaded him to set out his thoughts on the current state of fraud jurisprudence, and he provides an important historical perspective on the subject in his article, "Why the TTAB Got it Right in Medinol. [read post]
