Search for: "State v. So" Results 5881 - 5900 of 117,819
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2014, 3:37 pm
 So in November 2003, he gets to stay in the United States for a spell. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 9:34 am by Hannah Buxbaum
  So jurisdiction in the case would be based not on effects within the United States -- an easier case for regulation, since U.S. investors would be involved -- but on conduct within the United States. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 7:00 am by Ilya Somin
So the ruling could be justified based on the state constitution alone, without reference to the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:20 pm
The following is a reprint of a client advisory from last summer:On June 25, 2008, the United States Supreme Court in Exxon Shipping Company v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 7:13 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (1908) and Indian trust doctrine under United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 3:53 pm
  So even though federal court might generally be preferable in a lot of cases, you'd want to think deeply about it in any particular case, especially a class action.Here, you've got a defendant (Harley-Davidson) who removed the case under CAFA, saw the federal judge remand the case back to state court, and then filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit to keep it in federal court. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 2:28 am by sally
“For the last year or so, the law of nuisance has been in a state of flux pending this appeal. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 12:54 pm
 Doing so in a unanimous opinion.The certification process took approximately two years from the date the question was certified to the date it was answered.Imagine how long it might take if the question was a hard one. [read post]