Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws"
Results 5881 - 5900
of 55,066
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2007, 7:08 am
The court released its opinion in People v Waltonen, a case in which Michigan's Attorney General filed an appeal on behalf of Emmet County's prosecuting attorney. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 1:14 am
The Fourth Circuit addresses this question in West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 9:00 am
Heck, if you don't own a DVD/movie, then even though you bought it (for $20-$50), Disney, or whomever, can now reverse established law (under Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:16 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 7:10 am
The ICO has issued a reprimand to the Labour Party for repeatedly failing to respond to people who asked what personal information the party held on them – known as a subject access request. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:37 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 3:59 pm
The case of Fair Housing Council v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 12:17 pm
Davis v. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 12:06 pm
Cox, 2013 PA Super 221 (Aug 2, 2013) [pdf] What is wrong with people? [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:26 am
Sources: Lucia v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 11:17 pm
Nebraska and Pierce v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 3:57 pm
Capelouto v. [read post]
Morgan v Morgan, 2017 WL 4512487 (N.D. Texas, 2017) [Australia][Habitual residence][Petition denied]
14 Dec 2017, 4:57 am
” (quoting Larbie v. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 11:28 am
In Lava Records v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court protected such laws in Employment Division v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:19 am
Sometimes the law changes not because the underlying politics change, but rather simply because a group of smart people take a fresh look at things.Today's opinion by Judge Paez is a good example of that.There were two prior opinions by the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 1:54 pm
Regarding data breaches, Transunion LLC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:33 am
Baze v. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 2:36 pm
However, in Mental Hygiene Legal Serv. v Spitzer (2007), the court enjoined the operation of this provision of the statute because it held that the continued detention of a respondent in every case following a probable cause determination but prior to a trial was "inherently coercive" and a violation of constitutional due process. [read post]
Wired.com reports that Judge Davis indicated he is likely to declare a mistrial in Capitol v. Thomas
4 Aug 2008, 2:31 pm
Thomas.Judge Hints at Mistrial in RIAA v. [read post]
