Search for: "Andrews v. Andrews"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 7,460
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2010, 7:40 pm
In the scrum that is capital litigation, for the next edition we’ve spotted: US Joshua Wayne Andrews v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 1:46 pm
But in Lee v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 11:57 am
Youtube, LLC, handed down Friday by Judge Richard Andrews (D. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:45 am
People v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
Daily Mail journalist and Stonewall member Andrew Pierce responded to the judgment with a column asking ‘If the Daily Mail is homophobic, why on earth do I work for it, Miss Trimingham? [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 4:10 am
We believe that she is just the person further to develop St Hugh's as Principal after the exceptionally successful tenure of Andrew Dilnot. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 5:20 am
Here is somelanguage from the decision, North Carolina v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 8:55 am
Case C-137/12 European Commission v Council of the European Union is a battle of the Euro-titans, with the European Commission picking on the Council on a matter of policy as well as principle. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
Andrew Holt characterizes it as “perhaps the most powerful European state of the Middle Age”. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
This opinion was the first reported Fourth Circuit opinion regarding a traffic stop since Rodriguez v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:29 pm
V. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm
On 28 June 2022, there will be a hearing/application in Emmy Tayler v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 4:14 pm
As already mentioned, on 18 June 2021 Steyn J heard an application in the case of Vardy v Rooney. [read post]
12 Nov 2024, 4:00 am
The UK’s inventive step assessment is set out in Pozzoli Spa v BDMO SA & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 588 and may be seen as a somewhat abbreviated assessment of inventive step compared with the EPO’s three-step more rigorous problem-solution approach. [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:11 pm
The case, Terry v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
Nokia v Oppo [2023] EWHC 23 (Pat) In a new development in the global dispute between Nokia and Oppo that spans seven jurisdictions across Europe and Asia, Mr Justice Meade of the English Patents Court has found that smartphone manufacturer Oppo infringes valid and standard essential Nokia 4G/5G patent EP2981103 on an “allocation of preamble sequences”. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 6:02 am
Attorneys Andrew S. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 10:28 pm
Bruning v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
In McCloskey v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 11:43 pm
As we noted in an earlier post, however, in Dean Martyn Percy v The Dean & Chapter of the Cathedral Church of Christ in Oxford of the Foundation of King Henry VIII [2020] UKET 3310878/2019, Employment Judge Andrew Clarke QC concluded at a preliminary hearing that Dean Percy was an employee for the purposes of s. 83(2)(a) of the Equality Act 2010, though not an employee of the Crown. [read post]
