Search for: "Branch v. State" Results 5901 - 5920 of 8,126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2014, 7:45 am by Steven Boutwell
On April 29, 2014, the United States Supreme Court issued opinions in both Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:54 am by Padraic F.X. Dugan, Esq.
Parens Patriae is the power of the State of New Jersey by its judicial branch to protect and watch over the interests of children who are incapable of protecting themselves. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 10:29 pm by Richard Hornsby
As for who has the better legal argument, I would point out that the State cited State v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am by Walter Shaub
Meadows to the State of Georgia’s Response to his Notice of Removal at 1, State of Georgia v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:09 am by SHG
” It’s not because a state Supreme Court ordered it, but because it has evolved into standard use. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 12:34 am
Could you point me to the provisions you believe prohibit the judicial branch from posting the docket information? [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am by Eugene Volokh
"[2] In particular, the right to public access "protects the public's ability to oversee and monitor the workings of the Judicial Branch,"[3] and "promotes the institutional integrity of the Judicial Branch. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 2:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Without some evidence of actual, ascertainable damages flowing from Goldberg's alleged failure to conduct discovery, this branch of plaintiff's legal malpractice claim fails (see Luniewski, 188 AD2d at 643). [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 10:19 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Sometimes the Court issues a sweeping opinion nullifying these enactments and throwing down the gauntlet to the political branches, in an act that I call a "preemptive opinion. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 4:24 am
Without some evidence of actual, ascertainable damages flowing from Goldberg's alleged failure to conduct discovery, this branch of plaintiff's legal malpractice claim fails (see Luniewski, 188 AD2d at 643). [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:34 am by Stephen Griffin
I doubt whether any scholar could do as well.I will devote two subsequent posts to Justice Breyer's book, one to his discussion of United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
ABlawg.caEighty Percent Of Success Is Showing Up: Or “How A Pro Se Farmer Won A Default Against The United States In His Suit To Invalidate The Permit For Half Of Keystone Xl (& Why It Probably Won’t Last)”Case commented on: Bishop v Bostick, 9:13-cv-00082, (E.D. [read post]