Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 12,894
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2015, 5:43 pm
Sacks and Rachel B. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 1:24 pm
Regrettably there is no substitute for quoting the section:"to identify—(a) which person or apparatus is using an internet service where—(i) the service and time of use are already known, but(ii) the identity of the person or apparatus using the service is not known,(b) which internet communications service is being used, and when andhow it is being used, by a person or apparatus whose identity is already known, or(c) where or when a person or apparatus whose… [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 1:24 pm
Regrettably there is no substitute for quoting the section:"to identify—(a) which person or apparatus is using an internet service where—(i) the service and time of use are already known, but(ii) the identity of the person or apparatus using the service is not known,(b) which internet communications service is being used, and when andhow it is being used, by a person or apparatus whose identity is already known, or(c) where or when a person or apparatus whose… [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 10:13 am
It (a) assumes that class actions provide consumers with real, unalloyed benefits; (b) ignores any possible benefits provided by arbitration; and (c) concludes that arbitration therefore must be harmful. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 5:11 am
Property damage plaintiffs were required to submit affidavits explaining: (a) property address, (b) facts re contamination, and (c) degree of diminution in value. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 4:45 am
C&B was to perform traffic control. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 6:25 am
The proposed rule would add another example to 29 CFR 1635.8(c)(2) to clarify that an employer is not barred from seeking information, through medical questionnaires, medical examinations (e.g., to detect high blood pressure or high cholesterol), or both, concerning the current or past health status of an employee’s spouse who is covered by the employer’s group health plan and is completing a HRA voluntarily in compliance with 29 CFR 1635.8(b)(2). [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 7:27 am
(c) Before accepting any premium or fee for a named driver policy, an agent or insurer, including a county mutual insurance company, must receive a copy of the disclosure described by Subsection (b) that is signed by the applicant or insured. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 4:29 pm
”In contrast section 8 of the Representation Agreement Act provides:Test of incapability for standard provisions8 (1) An adult may make a representation agreement consisting of one or more of the standard provisions authorized by section 7 even though the adult is incapable of(a) making a contract,(b) managing his or her health care, personal care or legal matters, or(c) the routine management of his or her financial affairs.(2) In deciding whether an adult is… [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 4:07 pm
., landscaping, security, maintenance) through related companies. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 4:07 pm
., landscaping, security, maintenance) through related companies. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 1:12 pm
Winters: it fits in the theme b/c it’s a conversation, but agrees it’s different. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:24 am
” This is worse than ordinary rent seeking b/c it unsettles old policy, delays convergence on new policy. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 9:42 am
The staff has been surprised that more companies have not taken advantage of Rule 506(c), choosing instead to continue to make private offerings under Rule 506(b). [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 9:17 am
Went after a company selling green coffee diet products, with lots of websites/ads, but also an appearance by company owner on Dr. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:48 am
[No, because of the Establishment Clause, not b/c of a general restriction on gov’t position-taking.] [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 11:27 am
Use of such Covered Product enables the user to reduce food intake, including by as much as by fifty percent; B. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 9:47 am
” A spokesperson for the pharmaceutical company said that the new labels will also warn of a contraindication for patients with Child-Pugh B cirrhosis, and will include a recommendation that medical professionals look for evidence of hepatic decompensation before prescribing Viekira Pak. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 7:19 am
What Does This Mean for My Company? [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 6:56 am
The guidance follows the decision of the European Court of Justice (the ECJ) in Case C-362/14 – Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner that Decision 2000/520 of the European Commission, which stated that Safe Harbor-certified US companies provide adequate protection for personal data transferred to them from the EU (the Safe Harbor Adequacy Decision), is invalid. [read post]
