Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 48,975
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2021, 5:06 am
In the interest of judicial economy, rather than remit the matter to the Supreme Court for consideration of the motion on the merits, we find that the defendant has established that consolidation is appropriate here, as “it will avoid unnecessary duplication of trials, save unnecessary costs and expense, and prevent an injustice which would result from divergent decisions based on the same facts” (Viafax Corp. v Citicorp Leasing, Inc., 54 AD3d 846, 850; see Rhoe… [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
Synergistic cost savings, access to new […] [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 12:06 am
V. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:08 pm
In the federal district court case, Kelley v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm
They cost too much and force small business owners, particularly those in minority communities, out of business. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 8:41 pm
White v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm
A missing apostrophe in a Facebook post could cost real estate agent Anthony Zadravic thousands of dollars after a court ruled a defamation case against him could proceed. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 3:00 pm
Ashbrook will cover reasonable travel costs to the academy. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 12:52 pm
In Lay v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 10:39 am
But I think the Court was right in Packingham v. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 4:55 pm
The court cited Gichuru v. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 10:14 am
Amazon and Tice v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 1:31 pm
Although the NCAA v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 10:18 am
Last week I found out about an IP Bridge v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:16 am
V. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:16 am
V. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 6:56 am
That’s exactly what seemed to happen in the case of Gallagher v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 6:56 am
That’s exactly what seemed to happen in the case of Gallagher v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
Heller (2008) and McDonald v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
Retired employees over age 65, however, were required to enroll in a Medicare Part B program [Part B] and the district reimbursed retirees the cost of Part B coverage. [read post]
