Search for: "Courts and Judicial System" Results 5901 - 5920 of 26,731
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2022, 12:09 pm by Phil Dixon
While the case was on appeal to the Fourth Circuit, North Carolina amended its laws to provide for a judicial determination of substantial similarity. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 9:31 am by Mark Cohen, editor
The other recount was, of course, just a couple of months ago -- and that came in a judicial election.As loyal readers of this blog will no doubt recall, Supreme Court Justice Lorie Skjerven Gildea faced three challengers in the primary -- public defender Richard Gallo, Minneapolis attorney Jill Clark and Hennepin County District Court Judge Deborah Hedlund. [read post]
11 May 2023, 12:50 pm by kblocher@hslf.org
Today’s ruling by the highest court in the land marks the end of the line in terms of opponents’ judicial efforts in this case. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 12:49 pm by Ravi S. Nagi
This basic rule embedded in our court system means that a final judgment on the merits of the case by a court with jurisdiction is deemed to be conclusive between the parties as to all matters that were litigated or that could've been litigated in that lawsuit. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 6:46 pm
The pension was from the New York City Pension System which was then in pay-out status. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 6:56 pm by Valerie Oosterveld
Photo Credit: FIDH The schedule for Day Two of the International Criminal Court (ICC) Assembly of States Parties (ASP) was packed, with a continuation of the General Debate, informal consultations on the draft resolution “Review of the International Criminal Court and the Rome Statute system”, and informal consultations on the 2020 budget on the schedule. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:47 am by Sean Wajert
A federal court recently certified a class of Minnesota building owners in litigation over issues with plumbing systems. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 4:20 pm
Ethos Recycling Ltd v Barking & Dagenham Magistrates Court [2009] EWHC 2885 (Admin) This was an application for judicial review by Ethos Recycling of a District Judge's decision in the Barking and Dagenham Magistrates' Court given at Havering Magistrates Court, dismissing Ethos Recycling's appeal against an abatement order served by LB Barking and Dagenham. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The first point to make here is that in European legal systems, it is the responsibility of the courts to give a definitive interpretation of the law, not the executive, and as a result any such interpretation by the administration (including administrative agencies) is subject to review by courts. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 8:56 am
Prior to this, in New York Citys criminal justice system all post-indictment felony cases were prosecuted exclusively in the Supreme Court, and all misdemeanor cases were prosecuted exclusively in the Criminal Court of the City of New York. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
In a new report, the Center for American Progress argues that term limits would depoliticize the judicial confirmation process and make justices more responsive to the public, and in a Tuesday webinar tied to the report, a panel of experts explained various term-limit proposals. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 6:29 am by Jacques Singer-Emery
Paradis maintained that the reason for this draconian rule is that even a feeling of judicial partiality might cause the public to stop trusting this country’s the judicial system. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
District court holds that, depending on the facts, defendant state-court judges may not be entitled to judicial immunity for setting up a system under which people arrested for failing to pay fines and fees were denied counsel or hearings about their ability to pay. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm by Gesa Kübek
The Council decisions on the conclusion of the Istanbul Convention on behalf of the EU were carefully crafted, confining the EU’s accession to matters related to judicial cooperation in criminal matters, asylum and non-refoulement. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 5:57 pm
I understand that we don't run our judicial system by opinion poll and there is a very good reason for that. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 4:58 pm by Justin Tenuto
First Amendment & Free Speech: No matter their judicial philosophies on the bench, it’s exceedingly rare that the Supreme Court abridges speech. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 11:00 am
The court ruled, in effect, that the United States can imprison people virtually forever without judicial review. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 6:46 pm
" It said the case was treated normally through regular court procedures, and that the woman, her male companion and the perpetrators of the crime all agreed in court to the sentences handed down.I know the sentence is pretty much impossible to justify, but this wasn't even trying. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 2:22 pm by Eugene Volokh
A judge may engage in extra-judicial activities that do not (1) cast doubt on the judge's capacity to act impartially as a judge; (2) detract from the dignity of judicial office; or (3) interfere with the proper performance of judicial duties and are not incompatible with judicial office (see 22 NYCRR 100.4[A][1]-[3]). [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Supreme Court Rejects Fen-Phen Lawyers’ Appeal of $42M Kentucky Verdict” [Insurance Journal, earlier] In action against five drug firms over opioid marketing, California’s Santa Clara County partners with law firms Robinson Calcagnie, Cohen Milstein, and Hagens Berman, marking at least the tenth time the county has teamed up with outside law firms to file suits [Legal NewsLine; earlier on Chicago's involvement in painkiller suit] Lester Brickman on fraud in… [read post]