Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 8,962
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2012, 1:21 pm
It was entitled “The Class Definition That Works . . . or Does It? [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 7:12 am
Under that type of charge, the government does not have to prove that you actually delivered the substance, but only that you had an intent to do so. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 11:00 pm
It is not allowed in cases where the defendant can raise individualized defenses. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:22 am
Does that count as a win (because the law was ultimately upheld), or a tie (because the Court rejected the government’s primary argument for sustaining it)? [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am
§ 78n-1(c)). [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am
§ 78n-1(c)). [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am
The Dodd-Frank Act, however, “specifically provides” that the say-on-pay vote (1) “shall not be binding on the issuer or the board of directors;” and (2) does not “create or imply any change to the fiduciary duties of the board members.” 15 U.S.C. § 78n-1(c)). [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am
§ 78n-1(c)). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:02 pm
If you were unfamiliar with relative risk, you might try to figure out this question with the equation below: 20% – 1% = 19% – WRONG So does Scarlet increase her chances of getting cancer by 19% by becoming a smoker? [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 2:30 pm
” Id. at *20-27. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:15 pm
On September 20, 2007 the same court which subsequently heard the Stone Street v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 1:15 pm
On September 20, 2007 the same court which subsequently heard the Stone Street v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:14 am
In particular: Recital 1 (see also Recital 9 and Article 1): “Publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments and museums, as well as archives, film or audio heritage institutions and public-service broadcasting organisations, established in the Member States, are engaged in large-scale digitization …” [are they the only ones? [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 6:41 am
In particular: Recital 1 (see also Recital 9 and Article 1): “Publicly accessible libraries, educational establishments and museums, as well as archives, film or audio heritage institutions and public-service broadcasting organisations, established in the Member States, are engaged in large-scale digitization …” [are they the only ones? [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:46 am
Rule 1:21-7, which caps fees on those same gradations. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 7:00 am
So the question arises as to whether the proposed constitutional amendment does indeed reflect the general principles of the CRC. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 4:23 am
Debtor filed a Chapter 7 Petition on May 1, 2009. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 10:56 am
District Court sitting in Asheville, North Carolina (case no. 1:12-CV-00334). [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 7:22 pm
J.C.S.,175 N.J. 309, 323 (2003), the Court held: "the ten-day provision does not preclude a continuance where fundamental fairness dictates allowing a defendant additional time. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
McCarty, the United States Supreme Court fooled around for about 20 or 30 pages of opinion and finally concluded that there was apparently a DUI exception to the constitution. [read post]
