Search for: "Doe v. Smith"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 7,276
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
” He declined to say whether he still does. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 4:03 am
This is a postscript to Adam Wagner’s post this morning on the UKSC decision in R (Smith) v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm
Citizens United and McDonald fit that description, as does the attorney’s fees case, Perdue. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:51 am
Smith Want to know why so many states and municipalities are insolvent and teetering on bankruptcy? [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:48 am
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 JUDGMENT The Supreme Court allowed the appeal on the jurisdiction issue (Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Kerr dissenting) and unanimously dismissed the appeal on the inquest issue. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:41 am
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 – Read judgment The Supreme Court has ruled by a 6-3 majority that the Human Rights Act does not apply on the battlefield and soldiers are not automatically entitled to inquests arising from deaths in foreign conflicts. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 8:33 pm
"Smith condemns Fiji press crackdown" http://j.mp/9QuhUP i'm not sure what this means ... [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 3:28 am
Nor of State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:47 pm
The decision in McDonald v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:34 pm
(FTC v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:46 am
The Court previously considered and rejected a similar claim in Green v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:43 am
Smith, 2010 Ore. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:24 am
We now have the answer to this question in the form of KCI Licensing v Smith and Nephew Inc, a judgment recently handed down by Arnold J (here, noted by the IPKat here).In this case a US provisional application was filed in the name of the inventor, with KCI being the successor in title. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:11 am
[19] The use and misuse of the term “proximate cause” was discussed by Smith J.A. in Chambers v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:09 am
Smith and Dr. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:30 am
” Perry v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
(Class 46) Poland Reputation's rating (Class 46) Polish patent attorneys’ professionalism (Class 46) South Africa Orange miniskirt debacle less filling (Patent Baristas) (Class 46) Spain Supreme Court rules on marks consisting of colours ‘per se’ (Class 46) Tunisia Tunisia lines up for copyright training (Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC: KCI negative pressure patent valid and infringed: KCI Licensing Inc and others v… [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm
If so … (Class 46) Poland Reputation’s rating (Class 46) Polish patent attorneys’ professionalism (Class 46) South Africa Orange miniskirt debacle less filling (Patent Baristas) (Class 46) Spain Supreme Court rules on marks consisting of colours ‘per se’ (Class 46) Tunisia Tunisia lines up for copyright training (Afro-IP) United Kingdom EWHC: KCI negative pressure patent valid and infringed: KCI Licensing Inc and others v Smith… [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm
Finally, there was the Google/YouTube v. [read post]
