Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 12,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2024, 6:36 am
And scholars, like Thomas Merrill, have noticed how most of the opinion does not seem to follow from the two-step standard of review. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:33 pm
At the SEC open meeting held on August 29, 2012, the SEC proposed rules to implement the requirements of Section 201(a) of the JOBS Act. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 3:59 am
Based on the facts as we know them, here’s my 10 cents: 1. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 12:00 pm
Order N-29-20 § 3; Exec. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am
" Tr. at 4-5, July 29, 2008. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:04 pm
The decision of the Abu Dhabi Supreme Court (hereafter “ADSC”) reported here (Ruling No. 245/2024 of 29 April 2024) shed some light on this ambiguity. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:52 am
Maybe there is a name that really does drive sale [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 4:39 am
Code § 1028A(a)(1). [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
According to a new decision, CEQA does not preclude all agency involvement or that of elected officials. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
But in my view, all of that commentary totally missed what is really important here: How does this decision affect me? [read post]
5 May 2024, 6:44 pm
A Legal Analysis of Hong Kong’s New Safeguarding National Security Ordinance and What it Means for Lawyers[1]Jointly issued by Asian Lawyers Network, The 29 Principles and Lawyers for Lawyers26 April 2024On March 19, Hong Kong’s Legislative Council (LegCo) passed the “Safeguarding National Security Ordinance” (SNSO)[2] popularly known as Article 23 or the Article 23 law, referring to Article 23 of the Basic Law, which calls on the region to… [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 10:00 am
Id.at **28-29. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 12:32 pm
July 1, 2020 Marston, J.) [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:53 am
".The full ruling of the Court of Justice looks like this: "1. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 7:27 am
However, delinquencies dropped by .1% for Q1 2019. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 9:31 am
Discussion In New Hampshire, the attorney-client privilege is set forth in Rule 502 of the New Hampshire Rules of Evidence, which provides: A client has a privilege to refuse to disclose and to prevent any other person from disclosing confidential communications made for the purpose of facilitating the rendition of professional legal services to the client (1) between the client or his or her representative and the client’s lawyer or the lawyer’s representative…1… [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:00 am
— Alex Lauth (@AlexLauth) November 29, 2016 Yes. [read post]
13 Mar 2010, 9:46 pm
Vickaryous, 2001 BCSC 930, 19 R.F.L. (5th) 195 at paras. 28 to 29: [28] This application is brought pursuant to Rules 1, 2, 18A, 27 and 57 of the Rules of Court and s. 8 of the Law and Equity Act. [29] In an application such as this, the court may grant or dismiss the application to enforce a settlement, pursuant to Rule 18A. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 3:26 pm
Under 29 C.F.R. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 5:09 am
Id. at 29. [read post]
