Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 5901 - 5920 of 7,359
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2011, 6:26 pm by David Bernstein
(David Bernstein) As Ilya notes below, the Fifth Circuit has upheld the University of Texas’s racial and ethnic preference practices in Fisher v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:09 am
The SBAs issued an ordinance (Delegation of Functions to the Republic Ordinance) stating that the Republic of Cyprus are responsible for taking care of trade mark registrations for the SBAs. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 12:10 am by INFORRM
Yesterday’s decision in MGN v United Kingdom (Case No. 39401/04) has become the most discussed media law case of the year so far. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:08 pm by Bridget Crawford
Last week, Cherokee Nation District Court Judge John Cripps issued a decision (here) in the case of Nash v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:45 am by Mark Bennett
Schuwerk was the State Bar’s designated expert in Committee for Lawyer Discipline v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:20 pm
The opposite is also true, if there is a decline in your income, you may be able to lower your chapter 13 plan payments also.The Law Offices of James V. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 8:00 am by Amanda Rice
United States, the Armed Career Criminal Act case. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:16 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 3:04 am by Adam Wagner
The complainant visited and cannot state for certain if Desmond is responsible. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 1:43 am
What caused this distressing state of affairs? [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
R (on the application of) Reetha Suppiah and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Interveners [2011] EWHC 2 (Admin) – Read judgment A high court judge has ruled that two asylum seekers and their children were unlawfully detained at Yarl’s Wood immigration centre last year. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
The Grand Chamber stated in Cumpana v Romania on 17 December 2004 at paragraph 91, in the context of a publication covered by Article 10, that Article 8 “may require the adoption of positive measures designed to secure effective respect for private life even in the sp [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:40 pm by Alex Gasser
On January 14, 2011, the Federal Circuit is scheduled to hear oral argument in Qimonda AG v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:22 pm by jrvann
It is always interesting when a court holds that the laws of another country should apply, and such was the ruling in Albemarle Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:08 am by Susan Brenner
(Oh, and if you're wondering what the photo is, it's of a historic English Chancery Court.) [read post]