Search for: "Florida v. United States" Results 5901 - 5920 of 6,537
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2009, 4:22 am
Opinion below (08-1175, Supreme Court of Florida)Petition for certiorari (08-1175)Brief in opposition (08-1175) Docket: 08-1224Title: United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 11:05 am
Michael Moore of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida granted summary judgment for the defendant in Kilpatrick v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 12:01 am
United States, No. 08-497 (cert. petition filed Oct. 15, 2008) - the Federal Circuit held that the seizure as evidence was not a taking for public use because the seizure was an exercise of the government's "police power," and not an exercise of eminent domain. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:05 am
In doing so, did the Florida Court's decision cause a ''judicial taking" proscribed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution? [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 4:32 am
In doing so, did the Florida Court's decision cause a "judicial taking" proscribed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution? [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 4:43 pm
I recently received a poll asking me what I thought was the most important environmental case that ever came out of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 12:52 pm by Bill Ward
On June 15, 2009, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:31 am
As detailed in this order list, the Supreme Court this morning granted cert on United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
(in support of petitioner) Brief amicus curiae of the United States (recommending certiorari be granted) Docket: 08-1175 Title:   Florida v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 12:12 pm
In doing so, did the Florida Court's decision cause a "judicial taking" proscribed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:07 am
” The case is United Student Aid Fund v. [read post]