Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 5901 - 5920 of 18,110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 5:46 pm by Richard Primus
Last spring, I published a short essay about the relationship between the entry-ban litigation and Korematsu v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Steve Matthews
SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:56 am by ANDREW BODNAR, MATRIX
In R v May, R v Jennings, R v Green the House of Lords directed courts to consider the three questions which arise in making a confiscation order separately, even if the result was a low order. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:49 am by INFORRM
The facts of the claims The two trials took place sequentially in February and March of this year, both before Mr Justice Warby and with the claimants sharing the same legal team. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
The supporting briefs for both sides in Trump v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 9:06 am by Cortney Lollar
As Justice Samuel Alito remarked, “You’re reading a lot into [this statute]. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 7:40 am
Chief Justice Rehnquist’s disparate treatment of statistical evidence in McCleskey and Grutter v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 7:40 am by Christine Corcos
Chief Justice Rehnquist’s disparate treatment of statistical evidence in McCleskey and Grutter v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 5:19 am by Eugene Volokh
From a post (not by Michael Dorf) on Dorf on Law: Just about everyone is expecting Justice Gorsuch to vote with the conservatives [in Janus v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 2:49 am by INFORRM
The fifth day of the trial of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC saw the conclusion of the claimant’s case and the first witness for the BBC. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 10:55 am
  Nothing was more juicy than last month's decision from Mr Justice Carr in Illumnia v Premaitha [2018] EWHC 615 (Pat) in which he dealt with two applications brought by the defendants for (i) strike out of Illumina’s claim on the basis of abuse of process, and (ii) summary judgment against Illumina on the basis of issue estoppel. [read post]