Search for: "Level v. State"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 29,839
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2020, 11:24 am
It was the first fan fiction case in China, in which the legal status of unlicensed fan work was tested in court.Here’s what Xi writes: Unconstraint state of mind (?) [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm
[After two days of hero worship for Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Gorsuch, day three dumps on the Junior Justice.] [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:19 pm
The facts of Richard v BBC [2018] EWHC 1837 (Ch) help demonstrate this. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 7:59 am
State Auto Property & Casualty Ins. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:31 am
In Bird v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:09 am
Of course, the Court’s decision in Romer v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 3:42 am
[i] As a side note, all twenty were convicted and sentenced to between one and two years in prison, affirmed by People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 11:18 pm
From Judge Leo Sorokin's decision Monday in U.S. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm
I think this phrase "as expected" is projecting a level of omniscience to the Chief Justice that is unwarranted. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 3:59 pm
It won’t level the playing field, but it will ensure smaller companies have the right to play at all. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:59 pm
Based on these analyses, we observed a trend that both Japanese and Delaware courts have recently placed more weight on the merger price, which is believed to have accelerated the declining trend in number of cases and the level of premiums in the two jurisdictions. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 6:58 am
In the case of Juliana v United States, 21 Americans ranging in age from 11 to 22 filed a claim (Our Children’s Trust) initially in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon in 2015 arguing a fundamental right to live in a world with a stable climate system. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:29 am
Privacy Shield invalid in Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 1:57 pm
Privacy Shield), as the transfers at stake in the context of the national dispute leading to the request for preliminary ruling took place between the EU and the United States (“U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:11 am
Exxon Mobil Corp. in which the state alleges that Exxon Mobil deceived investors. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 9:53 am
Citing its 2016 decision in Ortiz v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:15 am
Williams, Hassell v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 6:59 am
That has to be assessed under the substantive underlying Member State law. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 3:05 am
To this, one may point out to what AG Szpunar wrote in the very opening of his Opinion in Ziggo [at [3]; Katpost here], an approach which the CJEU subsequently endorsed:The European Commission, whose opinion appears to me to be shared by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, contends that liability for sites of this type is a matter of copyright application, which can be resolved not at the level of EU law but under the domestic legal systems of the Member… [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 1:02 am
At 10, the authors state that third parties which are not nominal addressees of the FRAND commitment may still "benefit from the Huawei v ZTE negotiation framework". [read post]
