Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 5901 - 5920 of 21,107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed Supreme Court's granting the defendant's motion to dismiss Petitioner's complaint, explaining that Plaintiff's allegations relating to disability retirement recommendations of the Police Pension Fund's Medical Board are misdirected as [a] the Police Pension Fund is a corporate entity independent and distinct from the police department or the City of New York and [b] is not… [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 3:20 am by Rob Robinson
This is a directive which protects people’s living, safeguards democracy by defending a diverse media landscape, entrenches freedom of expression, and encourages start-ups and technological development. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 2:33 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In an enforcement action brought against him by the SEC, the defendant, Francis Lorenzo, argued that under the Janus case, he could not be held liable under the securities laws for forwarding a misleading email his boss had written because he did not “make” the false statement. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 11:26 am by Ronald Mann
Specifically, Justice Stephen Breyer’s opinion for six justices holds that defendant Francis Lorenzo is liable for participating in an unlawful scheme to defraud by distributing false statements written by his supervisor, even though the supervisor’s role protected Lorenzo from any liability for “making” the statements himself. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 8:30 am by Foran & Foran, P.A.
 The commission claimed it had no control over the subcontractor and, therefore, could not be vicariously liable for the plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 1:05 pm by Patricia Hughes
The rule of law, defended by an independent judiciary, plays a crucial function by ensuring that civil and political rights and civil liberties are safe and that the equality and dignity of all citizens are not at risk. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 9:26 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Failing to name all potentially liable parties can have a disastrous effect on the plaintiff’s case for several reasons. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:35 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The Facts of the Case According to the court’s written opinion, four people were seriously injured as a result of a car accident that was caused by a driver who was insured by the defendant insurance company. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 4:01 am by Berniard Law Firm
When an employee is in an accident while driving the company’s car, is the company’s insurer liable? [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
One of the principal grounds of appeal was that because the former employee’s conduct had occurred outside the scope of his employment, the company could not and should not be held liable. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:58 pm by Neumann Law Group
However, in California dog bite cases brought under the theory of negligence, whether the defendant breached a duty owed to the plaintiff and whether that breach was the cause of the plaintiff’s injuries are frequently contested. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 10:53 am by Eric Goldman
The court treats the defendants’ words and actions as just talk, when the defendants obviously rubbed salt on the community’s open wound from the loss. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 9:53 am by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
In many medical malpractice cases, there is more than one medical care provider that may be liable for causing the plaintiff harm. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 9:12 am by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
First, the plaintiff must possess sufficient facts and evidence to show that the defendant medical provider should be held liable for the plaintiff’s alleged harm. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 2:29 pm by Steve Kalar
  Big win for AFD Kimberly Trimble, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 1:09 pm by Throneberry Law Group
Supreme Court recently handed down a significant ruling in a mesothelioma lawsuit in which it held that companies may be held liable when third party components necessary for a product’s operation cause injury. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 1:54 am by Ben
 The court agreed, saying Grande's systems were even worse that Cox's:  "Grande thus did even less than Cox to 'reasonably implement' the kind of policy required for the protections of ... safe harbour ..... if lax enforcement and frequent circumvention of existent procedures disqualifies a defendant from the safe harbour's protections, the complete nonexistence of such procedures surely must do likewise"A federal… [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 12:17 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
She also provides strategic and other supports clients in defending litigation as lead strategy counsel, special counsel and as an expert witness. [read post]