Search for: "MATTER OF A W A V"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 8,375
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2011, 11:52 am
§§ 4651–4660–A (2010), against the landlord of that building, see Blackhouse v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 9:02 pm
The issue before the Court in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 7:25 am
Quon, 130 S.Ct. 2619 (2010) ( `Although as a general matter, warrantless searches “are per se unreasonable under the 4th Amendment,” there are `a few specifically . . . exceptions” to that general rule.') (quoting Katz v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
Patent and Trademark Office interprets this to mean no, never, no matter what. 15 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 10:05 pm
., v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 3:57 pm
Biskupic and Federal Defender Daniel W. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 10:44 pm
The district court reviewed the specification, to determine the subject matter that the inventor described as the invention. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am
In 2014, nonparty 46 East 82nd Street LLC, whose principal is nonparty Penny Bradley (Bradley), purchased the adjacent townhouse at 46 East 82nd Street, and proceeded to renovate the property (id., ¶ 6; NYSCEF Doc No. 56, affirmation of plaintiff’s counsel, exhibit W [defendant tr] at 11). [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
B-Roc Reps., Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) TTAB dismisses 2(d) opposition, finding BELL HILL for wine and BELL’S for beer too dissimilar: Bell's Brewery, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 6:03 pm
In December 2012, President George W. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 10:41 am
Nicholas W. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:44 pm
In contrast, "[w]hen a party challenges a claim's validity under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 9:01 am
W. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:40 pm
But, as I indicated in my last post on SB 8, US v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:04 pm
W. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Concepcion, Smith v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 4:38 pm
It later dropped the claim, presumably due to a recent English High Court decision (W Nagel (a firm) v Chaim Pluczenik [2022] EWHC 1714) concluding that the tort of abuse of process does not extend to foreign proceedings (at [96]). [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Ruttenberg v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 1:09 pm
Oiness v. [read post]
