Search for: "Person v. Person" Results 5901 - 5920 of 123,266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2013, 2:23 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
For judgment, please download: [2013] UKSC 63 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice; McGeoch v The Lord President of the Council & Anor [2013] UKSC 63 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 5:03 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  This is illustrated in the 1985, 14th Court of Appeals opinion, Hermann Hospital v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 11:00 am by Todd Janzen
Although a person may buy a patented item and resell it to someone else, a person cannot buy a patented item, reproduce multiple copies, and then sell it to someone else. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:42 pm
On April 20, 2011, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Sossamon v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 1:54 am
When accused tries to import victim’s sexual history DS v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:20 am by sally
Regina v W and others [2010] EWCA Crim 927; [2010] WLR (D) 125 “Where a person was accused of permitting the deposit, disposing or keeping of controlled waste, contrary to s 33 of the Control of Pollution Act 1990, the question whether the material in question amounted to ‘waste’, and if so, ‘controlled waste’, was a question of fact for the jury, as was the question of whether material which was originally waste had been acceptably recovered or… [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:50 am
Carrie Griffin Basas, 'V' is for Vegetarian: FDA-Mandated Vegetarian Food Labeling I became a vegetarian over a quarter-century ago, when... [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 12:35 pm by Joseph L. Hyde
Evidence that a person is the kind of person who behaves in a certain way almost always has some value as circumstantial evidence of how the person acted on a particular occasion. [read post]
16 May 2008, 1:59 am
R (Nasseri) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 464; [2008] WLR (D) 150 “The scope of the deeming provision in Sch 3, Pt 2, para 3(2) of the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants etc) Act 2004, which required states listed in Sch 2, Pt 2, para 2 of the Act to be treated as countries safe for a person to be returned, was limited to the actual process of executive decision or adjudication of whether a person's removal would… [read post]