Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 178,515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2017, 7:24 am
And although not necessary to show waiver, [counsel] also put forward evidence that [plaintiff's current counsel] was aware of [defense counsel's] prior relationship with [plaintiff]. . . . [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 8:30 am
.) -- holding that: (1) plaintiff’s failure to appeal ATF’s original decision was moot, because agency issued a new decision after plaintiff filed suit; (2) FBI performed adequate search for records concerning plaintiff, who did not oppose government’s motion; and (3) FBI properly withheld records pursuant to Exemptions 6, 7(C), 7(D), and 7(E), which plaintiff did not oppose.Emery v. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 1:14 pm
Census Bureau, plaintiff’s former employer, clearly established that its search was reasonably designed to find plaintiff’s personnel records, even if two items plaintiff sought ultimately were not found; rejecting plaintiff’s argument that the agency released several fake documents and noting that plaintiff would not be entitled to any relief under FOIA even if such fabrication had occurred. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 7:32 am
At first, the plaintiffs claim was only for compensatory damages. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 3:22 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 5:16 am
Plaintiff’s lawyer in one of the class actions moved the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) to centralize the lawsuits for pretrial purposes in the Northern District of California. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 10:36 am
In a recent Computer Fraud and Abuse Act case, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s conclusion that the plaintiff had produced no evidence refuting the defendant’s contention that it honestly believed it was engaging in lawful business practices rather than intentionally deceiving or defrauding the plaintiff. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:39 pm
In a suit against John Doe defendant for copyright infringement arising from defendant’s alleged distribution of plaintiff’s movies via BitTorrent, plaintiff sent a subpoena to Comcast – defendant’s ISP – seeking defendant’s identify. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 6:12 am
During the birth, the plaintiff’s daughter became stuck and sustained an injury to her arm. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
On a motion to dismiss, we go by what the plaintiff alleges. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 7:39 am
Inadmissible, because the defendant’s opinion of the plaintiff’s abilities is not based on personal knowledge. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 5:55 pm
"In this case, the plaintiff's attorneys * * * filed a sixty-three page errata sheet containing 868 attempted changes to their client's deposition testimony": Today. the majority on a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 5:35 am
The court also rejected plaintiff's Establishment Clause and equal protection arguments. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Supreme Court granted the Employer's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Article 75 petition seeking to vacate an arbitration award, which ruling Plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Division. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Supreme Court granted the Employer's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Article 75 petition seeking to vacate an arbitration award, which ruling Plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Division. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 1:34 pm
Plaintiff's pastor, defendant Father Don LaCuesta, officiated at the funeral and during his homily revealed the suicide of plaintiff's son to the public. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 6:46 pm
Defendant moved to compel the deposition of a member of Plaintiff 's trial counsel regarding Plaintiff's pre-filing investigation. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 2:39 pm
Circuit’s opinion [August 28, 2015] in Klayman v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 8:04 am
The court denied plaintiff's motion to compel the production of all settlement and license agreements for the same technology field as the accused products. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 6:52 am
The court granted in part plaintiff's motion to compel documents and rejected defendant's argument that plaintiff was seeking documents for an improper purpose. [read post]
