Search for: "R. B." Results 5901 - 5920 of 55,746
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
§ 315(b) begins to run upon the service of an infringement complaint, even if the complaint is later dismissed without prejudice. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  In that case, a group of Australian investors who had purchased shares of National Australia Bank on the Australian Stock Exchange claimed that an executive of the bank’s Florida-based subsidiary had made false and misleading statements, which were repeated in the bank’s securities filings in violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 1:37 pm by Doug Cornelius
Accredited investor verification: The amendments would change the financial information that must be provided to non-accredited investors in Rule 506(b) private placements to align with the financial information that issuers must provide to investors in Regulation A offerings. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 12:54 pm
They cited to and attached Article 25 of the Brussels Regulation, but cited no cases in support of their 12(b)(3) motion on the substance of Austrian law. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
§ 704(b) (which prohibits lying about being awarded military medals) and held it to be invalid under the First Amendment. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 2:35 pm by Jeralyn
"Faux-Dem" Mike B. is blanketing the airwaves in every Super Tuesday state. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 1:56 pm by Shea M. Leitch and Andreas Kaltsounis
Notably, the bill also imports the GDPR’s concept of “sensitive data,” defined as “(a) personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, religious beliefs, mental or physical health condition or diagnosis, sexual orientation, or citizenship or immigration status; (b) the processing of genetic or biometric data for the purpose of uniquely identifying a natural person; (c) the personal data from a known child; or (d) spec [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Is it b/c they just gave up b/c disclaimer wasn’t enough? [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Courts eventually accepted that they were right—though notably without too much empirical evidence; note casual empiricism also on display in Conopco and Food Lion cases.If stores successfully bet on courts’ acceptance of consumers’ ability to distinguish, suggests more consumer perception invariance than we might have assumed—at least w/r/t things consumers already care about. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 8:38 am by Maggie Murphy
” Despite that, under current guidelines, licenses so marked should be accepted as List B documents for Form I-9 and E-Verify purposes if they meet the regulatory requirements — contain a photograph or information such as name, date of birth, gender, height, eye color, and address. [read post]
Employers May Require Employees to Maintain Confidentiality in Workplace Investigations In Apogee Retail, LLC d/b/a/ Unique Thrift Store, 368 NLRB No. 144 (Dec. 16, 2019), the NLRB upheld an employer’s right to require that employees maintain confidentiality in workplace investigations. [read post]