Search for: "S. W. v. State"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 14,906
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2016, 1:03 pm
The courts have rarely deferred to agency expertise and discretion.In Umberger v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 11:00 am
The conservative view is reflected in the Court’s most recent decision about the Establishment Clause, Town of Greece v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 6:25 am
Savage, September 8, 2016, Fletcher, W.). [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
, (Mosaic Magazine, August 17, 2015).Michael W. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 10:32 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:31 pm
This owes, in large part, to the High Court of Australia’s unanimous decision[1]in Cole v Whitfield (1988) 165 CLR 360. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am
Tasting the TM in Pepsi/Coke studies.What we know about brands v. what we know about TMs—Deven Desai has written about the distinction and the lack thereof that has been part of the problem. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm
Law scales by using the state; IP-free systems scale in 2 ways: (1) keeping things really simple, like “don’t copy w/o attribution” or “don’t copy. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 1:15 pm
US v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:24 pm
” That right, at least as Louis Vuitton wants to wield the statute, is in fatal tension with the First Amendment, according to the amicus brief, which cites the 2nd Circuit’s 2012 expansion of free speech rights in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am
Rory Little is the Joseph W. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 6:33 am
Jon W. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 6:24 am
A senior HR analyst who claimed she was transferred and later fired because she complained of being mistreated by her supervisor was allowed to proceed with her ADA, FMLA, and state law claims after a federal district court in Connecticut denied her employer’s motion for summary judgment (Szestakow v Metropolitan District Commission, September 6, 2016, Eginton, W.). [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 10:00 pm
They have been invited to the likely final hearing for United States of America v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 2:31 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:26 am
W. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 10:14 am
In Smith v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 1:10 pm
Torres, The Miner’s Canary 274-283 (2002). [7] Atwater v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 10:28 am
The 9th employs AEDPA deference to conclude that the state's appellate court decision was neither contrary to, nor an unreasonable application of, the Supreme Court's decision in Smith v. [read post]
