Search for: "State v. Argus " Results 5901 - 5920 of 85,042
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2022, 2:22 pm by Ilya Somin
The first was that sanctuaries beat the administration at the Supreme Court in June of that year; technically, the justices declined to hear United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 1:45 pm
State of Ohio, (Jan. 9, 2008), 2008-ohio-38] and City of Lima v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 11:00 am by Bryan Hawkins
Instead, Wisconsin argued the blood draw was permissible under the state’s Implied Consent statute. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 5:41 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Coercion, Cooperative Federalism and Conditional Spending after NFIB v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 5:43 pm
  The United States Supreme Court rejected that argument in Baze v. [read post]
United States, No. 11-597 (cert. granted Apr. 2, 2012), the takings case argued earlier this week in the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 8:36 am by Jon Sands
Sessoms v Runnels, No. 08-17790 (6-3-11)(Tallman with Rawlinson; dissent by B. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Cathyrn Hopkins, Olswang LLP
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:43 pm by Derek Dissinger
A few months ago I wrote about a case I argued in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]