Search for: "State v. Click"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 10,829
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2012, 4:00 am
In Canada Trust Co. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:01 pm
(G 10/93 [4]).Therefore, it cannot be the purpose of examination appeal proceedings to completely re-open (völlig neu aufzurollen) the examination proceedings and to admit claims comprising extended definitions of features if, as here, these claims could already have been filed during the examination proceedings and the extensions are not appropriate in view of overcoming objections that had been raised in the impugned decision or by the Board.It may be left open whether the… [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:11 am
National Loan Closers Inc., et al. can be found by clicking here. [read post]
2 May 2012, 10:57 am
In the case of Fuller v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:08 am
State v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:01 pm
Therefore, it has to be established whether this use, which constitutes a method for treatment of the human body by surgery or therapy, confers novelty to the claimed subject-matter.[3.2] According to A 54(4), it is possible to acknowledge the novelty of a “… substance or composition, comprised in the state of the art, for use in a method referred to in A 53(c), provided that its use for any such method is not comprised in the state of the art” (emphasis… [read post]
1 May 2012, 2:14 pm
In its landmark ACLU v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
JERICHO STATE CAPITAL CORP. [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:12 am
Melcher, click here. [read post]
1 May 2012, 7:24 am
So-called "symbolic speech" cases involve conduct through which the actor intends to convey a specific message and the audience reasonably understands the intended message.The concept is familiar to media law students, but apparently is lost on United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Judge Raymond Jackson, who last week ruled in Bland v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:49 am
In the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:26 am
The United States Supreme Court has granted cert in a case for the purpose of clarifying whether the Court's previous decision in Padilla v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:24 am
The United States Supreme Court has granted cert in a case for the purpose of clarifying whether the Court's previous decision in Padilla v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:06 am
I wrote about it on February 20th of this year, and if you didn’t see it, I’d suggest that you continue reading what follows and then if you think it necessary, you can click DOER ALERT to read the original article. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 9:11 pm
Here, the court cited Specht v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 9:30 am
In Bland v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 9:07 am
Opinions and statements expressed in these profiles are those of their subjects - not the State Bar of Texas. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:53 am
” Gunter argued that the Ninth Circuit’s holding in Perfect 10 v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:03 am
Click blow the fold to see more. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 2:07 am
Read the whole opinion, Dus v. [read post]
