Search for: "State v. Country" Results 5901 - 5920 of 26,697
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2013, 2:26 am by Laura Sandwell
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, R (Heathrow Hub Limited & Anor) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, and R (Buckinghamshire County Council & Ors) v The Secretary of State for Transport, heard 15 – 16 October 2013. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 4:39 am by Rosalind English
It was a diplomatic agreement between the countries concerned. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
They argued that their clients shouldn’t have to pay taxes (United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 10:14 am by Lisa Vicens and Samuel Levander
ShareThis article is part of a symposium on the court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:06 pm by Joe Consumer
In the month after spending $950,000 on the pro-Karmeier ads, RSLC spent more than $3 million on other races around the country. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 6:16 am
Jack Goldsmith argues today that Supreme Court should avoid the difficult questions of exclusive executive power in Zivotosfky v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:35 pm
The object of this study is international migration, i.e. migration across country borders. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:19 am by Joel R. Brandes
[Germany ] [Habitual Residence] In Hamprecht v Hamprecht, 2012 WL 1890857 (M.D.Fla.) [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 12:11 pm
Other countries have not applied equitable tolling, preferring in many cases (Australia being an exception; see Director-General v. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:22 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
These visas—numbering over 2,300—would have permitted applicants from China to live and work in this country as legal permanent residents and to start on a path to United States citizenship at the time intended by Congress. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 7:12 am by Cody M. Poplin
Islamic Republic of Iran, a case that asks whether country-code top-level domains are the property of those countries’ foreign governments. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 11:35 am
After the 5-4 "decision" last month in Obergefell v. [read post]