Search for: "State v. House"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 28,800
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2014, 1:11 am
In Lawson v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 10:23 am
As one way of advancing the express purpose of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act to provide effective remedies for discrimination at the workplace, a special venue provision allows plaintiffs to file a lawsuit “in any county in the state in which the unlawful practice is alleged to have been committed, in the county in which the records relevant to the practice are maintained and administered, or in the county in which the aggrieved person would have worked… [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:50 am
New London, Connecticut Mayor Daryl Finizio recently signed an agreement authorizing the construction a “memorial park” on the former site of Susette Kelo’s “little pink house,” one of the fifteen residential properties condemned by the city as part of a failed development project that led to the Supreme Court’s controversial decision upholding the takings in Kelo v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:05 am
The sole exception appears to be where the applicant is close to dying and there is insufficient care available in the returning country to enable the applicant to die with dignity: N v Secretary of State for Home Department [2005] UKHL 31; [2005] 2 AC 296 and N v UK (2008) 47 EHRR 885. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:22 pm
For a bill of this magnitude, not getting the score before the vote was highly unorthodox .In King v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 10:15 am
Prewitt v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 4:42 am
s PR consultant had, incorrectly, stated that P2 did not know P1 this was an unauthorised statement which had been corrected within 3 days [19]. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 7:44 am
" United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 11:05 am
” But the position of the United States government in United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 7:09 am
This candidate believes the Indian Child Welfare Act is unconstitutional because two members of the United States Supreme Court dissented in Haaland v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 11:54 pm
Second, Small v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:37 am
Athough the Strasbourg Courg had established that the concept of civil rights was autonomous, and not solely defined by signatory countries (Konig v Germany (No1) (A/27) (1979-80) 2 EHRR 170 ECHR), nevertheless Article 6 could only apply to civil rights that were arguably recognised under domestic law ( as established by the House of Lords in Matthews v Ministry of Defence (2003) UKHL 4, (2003) 1 AC 1163 applied). [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 2:33 pm
The text of the State of the Union (as posted to the White House website) follows. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 11:47 am
On March 18, 2016, the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut decided Fabian v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 9:37 am
Mountain States Mutual Casualty Company, 205 P.3d 529 (Colo. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided Florida v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 11:32 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Atkinson v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 11:15 am
In United States v. [read post]
