Search for: "Still v. Justice Court"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 19,603
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2012, 3:01 pm
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:40 am
District Court Judgerecently issued in a civil suit: Taha v. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 11:30 pm
Summarising the Court of Appeal’s guidance when it applied Budvar, Mr Justice Carr said that honest co-existence for a long period of the same or closely similar names may have to be tolerated. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:08 am
Lee v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 6:11 pm
Here is the abstract: In this brief essay, I try to draw some connections between the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Graham v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 12:11 pm
In March, the Justices agreed to hear the appeal of Henry Montgomery of Baton Rouge, who is seeking retroactive application of the Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
PatentsGuestKat Rose Hughes reports on a recent English High Court case (Emson v Hozelock), in which Mr Justice Nugee, in a follow-up to the classic UK case Windsurfing, considered the issue of when a disclosure may be considered public. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 11:15 am
Roe v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 2:40 pm
Today a six-Justice majority of the Supreme Court took a big step toward making Crawford a narrow rule, with a seventh Justice holding out for a position that is narrower still (I think). [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
As a reminder, and as stated in Dhont v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 8:32 am
The Court has now docketed District of Columbia v. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
See Hay v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 4:55 am
Surprisingly, Justice Sotomayor wrote for the majority; Justice Giinsburg recused herself; and just as surprisingly, Justice Scalia wrote in dissent.This case is significant to the extent that it allows police officers to testify at a trial about what an out-of-court (i.e. hearsay) witness said when that witness is no longer available for purposes of cross-examination and in-court confrontation. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 7:18 am
Surprisingly, Justice Sotomayor wrote for the majority; Justice Giinsburg recused herself; and just as surprisingly, Justice Scalia wrote in dissent.This case is significant to the extent that it allows police officers to testify at a trial about what an out-of-court (i.e. hearsay) witness said when that witness is no longer available for purposes of cross-examination and in-court confrontation. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 12:06 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Vance v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:09 am
Mikula v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 4:14 pm
" (Justice Scalia, you may recall, filed a dissenting opinion in the Court's landmark decision in Atkins v. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 2:54 pm
(Especially when, as here, the opinion is initially unpublished.)Still. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
No justice of the Supreme Court has been impeached in over 200 years. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 7:49 pm
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the patent licensing dispute known as Kimble v. [read post]
