Search for: "UNITED STATES v. FLORIDA"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 6,544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
Chairman Schapiro further stated that the end of the program was designed “to expedite the Commission’s enforcement efforts and ensure that justice is swiftly served. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:15 am
United States, 2009 U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 4:03 am
In doing so, did the Florida Court's decision cause a "judicial taking" proscribed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution? [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 1:15 pm
Busby v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 12:01 am
In Brody v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 2:52 pm
Cerabino: Story behind controversial court column [Palm Beach Post] Earlier: 'Holier' Than Thou: Motion to Compel Defense Counsel to Wear Appropriate Shoes at Trial Sponsored Topics: Palm Beach Post - Florida - United States - Law - Footwear [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
He would have lost anyway, because Dinkins v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 6:40 pm
Florida Dept. of Revenue v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 1:34 pm
Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida Ted Cooperstein discusses the decision. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 12:11 pm
Virginia, 2002) and juvenile defendants (Roper v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 9:05 pm
"The United States is one of the few countries that hand out JLWOP sentences. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 1:21 am
The two most important recent Florida state appellate decisions, both from 2009, are Mailloux v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 1:21 am
The two most important recent Florida state appellate decisions, both from 2009, are Mailloux v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
""United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 4:22 am
Opinion below (08-1175, Supreme Court of Florida)Petition for certiorari (08-1175)Brief in opposition (08-1175) Docket: 08-1224Title: United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 6:19 pm
., v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:05 pm
Hilen v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 11:05 am
Michael Moore of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida granted summary judgment for the defendant in Kilpatrick v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 12:01 am
United States, No. 08-497 (cert. petition filed Oct. 15, 2008) - the Federal Circuit held that the seizure as evidence was not a taking for public use because the seizure was an exercise of the government's "police power," and not an exercise of eminent domain. [read post]
